2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12127-010-0043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dopants on the analysis of pesticides by means of differential mobility spectrometry with atmospheric pressure photoionization

Abstract: The chances to improve the detection of pesticides using differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) with an atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) ion source by means of dopants was investigated. The effect of employing benzene, anisole and chlorobenzene as dopants is described regarding sensitivity, limits of detection and peak displacements in the spectra. For typical pesticides an improvement of detection limits up to two orders of magnitude could be determined, while for the peak shift of individual sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant development of DMS‐MS technology continued from this time in several laboratories that leveraged the expertise of the original Soviet developers now in North America (Nazarov et al, ,; Krylov, Nazarov, & Miller, ; Borsdorf, Nazarov, & Miller, ; Krylov & Nazarov, ; Nazarov, ,). Activities expanded into other groups outside this sphere of influence (Roetering et al, ; Borsdorf & Mayer, 2010; Spangler, ;). Notable efforts sprung up among new groups at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) (Richland, WA) (Shvartsburg, Maskevich, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg & Smith, 2007, 2011a, 2013b; Shvartsburg, ; Shvartsburg, Danielson, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg, Tang, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg et al, ), University of Florida (Rorrer & Yost, 2011; Tsai, Yost, & Garrett, ), University of North Carolina (Ferzoco et al, ; Ridgeway, Remes, & Glish, ; Isenberg, Armistead, & Glish, ), and Northeastern University (Levin et al, ,, ; Hall et al, ,, ; Kafle et al, , ).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant development of DMS‐MS technology continued from this time in several laboratories that leveraged the expertise of the original Soviet developers now in North America (Nazarov et al, ,; Krylov, Nazarov, & Miller, ; Borsdorf, Nazarov, & Miller, ; Krylov & Nazarov, ; Nazarov, ,). Activities expanded into other groups outside this sphere of influence (Roetering et al, ; Borsdorf & Mayer, 2010; Spangler, ;). Notable efforts sprung up among new groups at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) (Richland, WA) (Shvartsburg, Maskevich, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg & Smith, 2007, 2011a, 2013b; Shvartsburg, ; Shvartsburg, Danielson, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg, Tang, & Smith, ; Shvartsburg et al, ), University of Florida (Rorrer & Yost, 2011; Tsai, Yost, & Garrett, ), University of North Carolina (Ferzoco et al, ; Ridgeway, Remes, & Glish, ; Isenberg, Armistead, & Glish, ), and Northeastern University (Levin et al, ,, ; Hall et al, ,, ; Kafle et al, , ).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of APPI-DMS sensitivity in presence of dopant was previously demonstrated on examples of dimethyl methylphosphonate, [12] butanone, [12] and several pesticides [13]. Benzene is one of the dopants used in previous studies.…”
Section: Effect Of Benzene On Calibration Curves Slopes and Detectionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It was demonstrated that the addition of the appropriate amount of volatile organic compounds (dopants/modifiers) to the transport gas can significantly enhance the sensitivity of planar DMS with APPI ionization source [12,13]. Moreover, the increase of the resolving power of planar DMS in the presence of chemical modifiers was also demonstrated [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Roetering et al have demonstrated that the utilization of traces of benzene (0.260 ppm v ) for the analysis of the pesticides with APPI-DMS results in both an improvement of the sensitivity of the method and a shi of the analyte peaks. 36 The increase in the sensitivity was explained by the increased ionization efficiency of analytes over the charge exchange with the photoionized benzene radical cation. Despite the differences in ionization mechanisms proposed for APPI (depends on the ionization potential) and 63 Ni-ionization-based (depends on proton affinity) sources, these ndings demonstrate the prospects for the utilization of aromatic modiers for the improvement of the peak separation in the differential ion mobility based methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%