2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dried fermentation biomass on microbial fermentation in continuous culture and in vitro intestinal digestibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the in vitro technique used in the present study allows VFA to be produced but not absorbed as it happens in vivo (Carpenter et al 2017), our results indicate that more fermentationand consequently greater VFA productionoccurred when creep feed was added to the pure bermudagrass. Moreover, they show that the rumen microorganisms were able to ferment even more of these compounds when the treatment BGLUC was used.…”
Section: Volatile Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Because the in vitro technique used in the present study allows VFA to be produced but not absorbed as it happens in vivo (Carpenter et al 2017), our results indicate that more fermentationand consequently greater VFA productionoccurred when creep feed was added to the pure bermudagrass. Moreover, they show that the rumen microorganisms were able to ferment even more of these compounds when the treatment BGLUC was used.…”
Section: Volatile Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…An 8-unit, dual-flow, continuous culture fermenter system with a modified pH control and measuring system were used in two consecutive 10-d experimental periods, similar to that described by Hannah et al (1986) and fermenter operation was similar to Ruiz-Moreno et al (2015) , Carpenter, et al (2017) , and Fessenden et al (2017) . Treatments were randomly assigned and duplicated within experimental period to create a randomized complete block design with four observations per treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Period served as block with all treatments equally represented within block. Forages were analyzed as a fixed effect and period (block) was a random effect ( Ruiz-Moreno et al, 2015 ; Binversie et al, 2016 ; Carpenter et al, 2017 ). All treatment results were reported with least squares means, with significance declared at P < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%