2016
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1206560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Drip Fertigation on Yield, Water Use Efficiency, and Nutrients Availability in Banana in West Bengal, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with manual fertilization and surface irrigation, drip fertigation in tomato increases the N and K content by 45.6% and 45.3%, respectively [ 23 ]. In comparison with chemical fertilizers to soil, water and fertilizer coupling promotes soil fertility, in which drip fertigation is much better than pour fertilization [ 22 , 24 ]. Sufficient nutrition from DF accelerates plant growth in terms of the trunk diameter and dry matter [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with manual fertilization and surface irrigation, drip fertigation in tomato increases the N and K content by 45.6% and 45.3%, respectively [ 23 ]. In comparison with chemical fertilizers to soil, water and fertilizer coupling promotes soil fertility, in which drip fertigation is much better than pour fertilization [ 22 , 24 ]. Sufficient nutrition from DF accelerates plant growth in terms of the trunk diameter and dry matter [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of composting, a positive impact on adaptation may result because of the low cost of inputs such as plant materials and animal manures, which are naturally produced in the plantation, and the contribution of this measure to increase banana yields (Bekunda and Woomer 1996 ; Ouédraogo 2001 ). Similarly, nutrient management practices may contribute to farm adaptation by reducing the use of chemical fertilizers (lowering production costs) without compromising yields (Israeli et al 1985 ; Lobell 2007 ; Wairegi and van Asten 2010 ; Keshavan et al 2011 ; Pramanik et al 2016 ). Although they apply a different approach to determining climate change adaptation in their study (i.e., a multi-criteria analysis called PROMETHEE II), Nigussie et al ( 2018 ) reported that interventions addressing soil and land management such as crop rotation and composting were the most important for farm adaptation in the Upper Blue-Nile basin in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems are water and energy efficient, which surely increases yields, input use efficiency, and economic returns of field crops (V. Sharma et al, 2019). The advantages of adopting MI and sprinkler irrigation over other traditional surface irrigation methods have been reported by several authors (Bassoi et al, 2003;Kumar and Palanisami, 2010;Pramanik et al, 2016). Various researchers have reported significant water savings using MI compared to the conventional irrigation methods for different crops in the diverse agroclimatic regions of the country (Ayars et al, 1999;Pandey et al, 2012;Madhava Chandran and Surendran, 2016).…”
Section: And Sprinkler Irrigation Practices and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%