1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199901000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dry Fibrin Sealant Dressings versus Gauze Packing on Blood Loss in Grade V Liver Injuries in Resuscitated Swine

Abstract: In this model of grade V liver injury, blood loss with the DFSD was 51% of that observed with standard gauze packing (not statistically different). Initial survival data revealed no complications attributable to the fibrin dressing. DFSD may provide simple, rapid, and definitive hemorrhage control in life-threatening liver injuries without the need for reoperation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To create a variety of high-pressure ⁄ high-flow and low-pressure ⁄ low-flow states, bleeding time has varied in previous studies. [6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18] We chose to replicate a 3-minute bleed, which has clearly been demonstrated to produce a fatal wound. 7 While we are not aware of any existing field data that document average time to intervention in the operational environment, we believe that 3 minutes of bleeding is a gross estimate of the likely delay to care encountered on the battlefield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create a variety of high-pressure ⁄ high-flow and low-pressure ⁄ low-flow states, bleeding time has varied in previous studies. [6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18] We chose to replicate a 3-minute bleed, which has clearly been demonstrated to produce a fatal wound. 7 While we are not aware of any existing field data that document average time to intervention in the operational environment, we believe that 3 minutes of bleeding is a gross estimate of the likely delay to care encountered on the battlefield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of gauze packs did not differ among treatment groups, there was concern that the number used per pig (-23, Table 2) was greater than in previous studies (13-17 gauze packs; Holcomb et al, 1999a;Holcomb et al, 1999b), and that the increased gauzes might be associated with increased abdominal pressure and compartment syndrome. As an indirect measure of this potential complication (Ertel et al, 2000) the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ; Horowitz coefficient) was examined.…”
Section: Horowitz Coefficient and Inspiratory Airway Pressurementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Liver injuries were induced as previously reported (Holcomb et al, 1999a(Holcomb et al, , 1999b. Briefly, the liver was retracted by manually elevating the left and right medial lobes to allow adequate exposure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements of the model to test these new devices included focal arterial injuries with defined rates of bleeding. Previously described models of arterial injury were unsuitable because of hemodynamic instability or lack of information on bleeding rate at the site of injury (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). This model provides a stable test-bed with variable and controllable rates of arterial hemorrhage which can be used to study the characteristics of the bleeding site and the effectiveness of measures directed at the bleeding site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have utilized localized incisions in peripheral or central arteries (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), while others have utilized uncontrolled blast injuries which include soft tissue as well as vascular injury (16,17). A number of models include extensive liver lacerations (18,19,20), while others utilized side-hole injuries in the aorta (21, 22, 23). However, none of these studies assessed the injured artery bleeding rate separately and distinctly from the hemorrhagic shock response to the injury.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%