2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of early activation of cochlear implant on electrode impedance in pediatric population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in a previous study using the Nucleus implant system, a signi cant reduction in impedance for all electrode contacts from slim modiolar electrodes was also observed from the early switch-on group in the present study 18,24 . In contrast, other studies using the MED-EL or the Advanced Bionics implant system showed no signi cant decrease in impedance at early switch-on 19,20,25 20,22 . To the best of our knowledge, this is the rst study to report the time course of the postoperative impedance levels for a slim modiolar electrode array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…As reported in a previous study using the Nucleus implant system, a signi cant reduction in impedance for all electrode contacts from slim modiolar electrodes was also observed from the early switch-on group in the present study 18,24 . In contrast, other studies using the MED-EL or the Advanced Bionics implant system showed no signi cant decrease in impedance at early switch-on 19,20,25 20,22 . To the best of our knowledge, this is the rst study to report the time course of the postoperative impedance levels for a slim modiolar electrode array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…10,19 Threshold, MCL, and DR were further investigated, with all studies finding an increment over the course of the first month following implantation. 5,8,15,18 Although this would be expected with rising impedances, there was no significant relationship between threshold or MCL levels and impedance measured at 1 day or 1 month postoperatively. 8…”
Section: Audiometric Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Most studies do not provide granular information on postoperative clinical concerns, electing to use terms such as “no surgical complications.” 3–6,10,12,16,20,21 Other studies did not include any surgical outcome information, as their analysis focused on electrophysiological changes over the postoperative period. 9,13–15,17,18 A handful of studies have published clinical information that sheds some insight on this issue. Günther et al reported 23 CIs in 21 patients, with a median activation of 2 days postoperatively.…”
Section: Feasibility and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activation of the audio processor was performed three days after the CI surgery. Early activation of CI audioprocessor showed to be safe approach and more economic compared to classical activation that performed one month after the surgery [11]. Impedance field telemetry (IFT) was normal, and the ECAP was present only at electrodes 3 and 7.…”
Section: Audiological and Speech Assessment Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 95%