The impact of 3 different reperfusion sequences following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in pigs were evaluated. The reperfusion technique commonly performed is primary portal in order to shorten warm ischemic times (WITs). Experimental and clinical data, usually comparing 2 out of 3 possible reperfusion sequences, provide controversial results. OLT was performed in 24 pigs randomized into 3 groups: primary arterial (A), simultaneous (SIM), and primary portal (P) reperfusion. Hemodynamics were continuously monitored and reperfusion injury and primary graft function were assessed by standard serum parameters, histopathological findings, immunohistochemistry for heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), and heat shock protein 70 (HSP 70). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ␥-glutamyl transpeptidase (␥GT) following reperfusion were significantly increased for group A when compared to groups SIM and P. Hemodynamics showed significant differences after reperfusion compared to physiological data; differences in group comparisons were not significant. The bile production/100 g liver/hr was significantly higher for group SIM (1.15 mL) compared to group P (0.66 mL) and group A (0.62 mL). A lthough the first clinical liver transplantations were performed by arterial reperfusion before portal venous declamping, 1 the most common technique used is primary portal reperfusion. This sequence of reperfusion ought to minimize the warm ischemic time (WIT). This approach dates from an area when total ischemic time was limited to 8 hours of storage. With the implementation of University of Wisconsin and Bretschneider (histidinetryptophan-ketoglutarate [HTK]) solutions it became possible to prolong the cold storage beyond 20 hours. 2,3 Despite this and the more frequent use of marginal organs in solid organ transplantation, primary portal reperfusion in liver transplantation has yet not been altered, since most groups fear that a prolonged suturing time before reperfusion will cause a progressive rewarming and an increased injury of the liver graft, resulting in a higher incidence of primary nonfunction.