2008
DOI: 10.1680/gein.2008.15.1.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of effective overburden pressure on geomembrane/soil interface transmissivity

Abstract: Fluid flow through a defect in the geomembrane of a composite geomembrane/soil liner (flow rate tests) and interface transmissivity tests between a geomembrane and a soil layer were conducted. The results are compared, and the effect of overburden pressure p9 on the geomembrane/soil interface transmissivity Ł and interface thickness t in is investigated. For flow rate tests, the values of Ł are back-calculated using the Rowe and Touze-Foltz et al. solutions. With known values of Ł, t in is calculated using New… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the leakage rate is mainly controlled by GM defects, the interface transmissivity between the GM and the underlying medium also influences the leakage rate of composite liners. Chai et al [ 37 ] described two methods for calculating the value of transmissivity: one is by inverse calculation from the results of flow test experiments and the other is by directly measuring the GM/underlying layer interface transmissivity. For example, Barroso [ 38 ] measured the leakage rate of a GM (with holes)/GCL/soil-based composite liner through an indoor leakage test.…”
Section: Convection Of Pollutants Through Gm/gcl/almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the leakage rate is mainly controlled by GM defects, the interface transmissivity between the GM and the underlying medium also influences the leakage rate of composite liners. Chai et al [ 37 ] described two methods for calculating the value of transmissivity: one is by inverse calculation from the results of flow test experiments and the other is by directly measuring the GM/underlying layer interface transmissivity. For example, Barroso [ 38 ] measured the leakage rate of a GM (with holes)/GCL/soil-based composite liner through an indoor leakage test.…”
Section: Convection Of Pollutants Through Gm/gcl/almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite liners consisting of a geomembrane (GM) and a compacted clay layer (CCL) or a GM, a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL), and a soil liner (SL) are intended to minimize groundwater contamination due to the migration of landfill leachates Chai et al 2008;Varank et al 2011a, b). GCLs have been widely used in landfill liner systems to replace the traditional compacted clay liners (CCL) because of their low price, easily controlled construction quality, and low permeability (Koerner 2005;Guyonnet et al 2009;Bouazza and Bowders 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%