2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electric field on the photoluminescence intensity of single CdSe nanocrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
100
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, although many of the proposed models for blinking are based on charging processes, an alternative class of models based on fluctuating nonradiative rates 16,17,31,32 has also been proposed. In these models, blinking is associated with opening and closing certain nonradiative exciton recombination pathways involving localized surface states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although many of the proposed models for blinking are based on charging processes, an alternative class of models based on fluctuating nonradiative rates 16,17,31,32 has also been proposed. In these models, blinking is associated with opening and closing certain nonradiative exciton recombination pathways involving localized surface states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S9) as expected for the Stark effect. The intensity drop is partly attributed to field-induced dissociation of electron-hole pairs and their subsequent participation in non-radiative recombination processes 34,35 (such as Auger recombination). From our numerical simulations, we find that the central beam for the asymmetric slit-groove structure (Fig.…”
Section: Confocal Scanning Images Of the Collimated Fluorescent Emissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, above 4 V, the PL intensity decreases monotonically with increasing bias, tracking the decrease in EQE of the QD-LED. The correspondence between the decreasing PL intensities and EQE with applied bias identifies the change in the QD luminescence efficiency to be sufficient to explain the QD-LED roll-off behavior.Reduction of PL efficiency in QD thin films has been previously measured when QDs are heated [8], charged (Auger recombination) [9], or placed under a strong electric field [10,11]. We eliminate temperature effects on the QD PL efficiency, as measurement of the operating temperature of our QD-LEDs with an infrared camera shows a change of no more than a few degrees, which is not sufficient to affect the PL efficiency and explain the roll-off.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%