2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2018.8619967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Electrode Skin Impedance on Electromyography Signal Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving a low-impedance interface between the electrode and the skin is vital to transduce signals with high fidelity, as too high of an impedance increases the thermal noise of the electrodes, thus degrading their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. A low SNR may, in turn, prevent clean recording of muscle activation during electromyography (EMG) studies [ 8 ], or may cause morphological changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) signatures that can complicate interpretation [ 9 ]. The motion artifact susceptibility of skin-based electrodes may also increase with a higher impedance, further degrading signatures such as the QRS complex in ECG recordings [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving a low-impedance interface between the electrode and the skin is vital to transduce signals with high fidelity, as too high of an impedance increases the thermal noise of the electrodes, thus degrading their signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. A low SNR may, in turn, prevent clean recording of muscle activation during electromyography (EMG) studies [ 8 ], or may cause morphological changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) signatures that can complicate interpretation [ 9 ]. The motion artifact susceptibility of skin-based electrodes may also increase with a higher impedance, further degrading signatures such as the QRS complex in ECG recordings [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual inspection of the data, and reference to notes recorded by the experimenter during data collection, resulted in identification of invalid fEMG data for 27 subjects. Reasons for this varied (e.g., imprecise placement of electrodes leading to cross talk with other physiological signals, high impedance in the signal) but removal of invalid fEMG data prior to analysis is not uncommon (Potter & Bolls, 2012;Sae-lim et al, 2018). This resulted in a total of 28 participants in neutral spine and 24 participants in the spinal flexion condition included for the fEMG analyses.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage of the sEMG signal range from 50 μV to 100 mV and the frequency is varied from 10 to 500 Hz ( Pancholi and Joshi, 2018 ). The electrode skin impedance which is one of the noises that affects the quality of EMG signals must be as low as possible to obtain effective signals ( Sae-Lim et al, 2019 ). Pancholi and Joshi (2018) obtained sEMG signals from five different arm muscles using hardware based on ADS1298 IC (Texas Instruments) and ARM cortex M4 series processor with 4,000 Hz sampling frequency.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Surface Electromyography and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage of the sEMG signal range from 50 µV to 100 mV and the frequency is varied from 10 to 500 Hz (Pancholi and Joshi, 2018). The electrode skin impedance which is one of the noises that affects the quality of EMG signals must be as low as possible to obtain effective signals (Sae-Lim et al, 2019). Pancholi and Joshi (2018) (Zanca et al, 2014).…”
Section: Acquisition Of Surface Electromyography and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%