2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electroencephalogram-guided anaesthesia administration on 1-yr mortality: follow-up of a randomised clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…82 Given that exploratory end points are intended for hypothesis generation only, and that there was only a very modest difference in median ET MAC of 0.11 between the 2 groups, this particular finding should be interpreted with caution and may represent a type I error. Indeed, a subsequent post hoc analysis by Fritz et al 99 demonstrated no statistically significant difference in 1-year mortality between the pEEG-guided group and the routine care group (adjusted 1-year mortality = 9.6% vs 10.3%; difference = −0.7%; 95% CI, −4.3 to 2.8; P = .70), and this finding is in line with the results from the aforementioned Balanced Anesthesia Study. 89 At present, there is no robust prospective evidence to support that iatrogenic intraoperative burstsuppression, nor the purposeful avoidance of it, has any bearing on perioperative or long-term mortality.…”
Section: Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…82 Given that exploratory end points are intended for hypothesis generation only, and that there was only a very modest difference in median ET MAC of 0.11 between the 2 groups, this particular finding should be interpreted with caution and may represent a type I error. Indeed, a subsequent post hoc analysis by Fritz et al 99 demonstrated no statistically significant difference in 1-year mortality between the pEEG-guided group and the routine care group (adjusted 1-year mortality = 9.6% vs 10.3%; difference = −0.7%; 95% CI, −4.3 to 2.8; P = .70), and this finding is in line with the results from the aforementioned Balanced Anesthesia Study. 89 At present, there is no robust prospective evidence to support that iatrogenic intraoperative burstsuppression, nor the purposeful avoidance of it, has any bearing on perioperative or long-term mortality.…”
Section: Mortalitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The highly debated question of regional anesthesia reducing metastasis recurrence long-term is difficult to analyze given the plethora of studies that fail to provide clear benefits of using regional anesthesia despite the importance of the question [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. Remarkably, the depth of anesthesia correlates in some studies with the emergence of postoperative delirium [65][66][67]. The emergence of delirium carries a significant risk of long-term decline, but definitive studies are missing.…”
Section: The Effect Of Anesthesia On Long-term Postoperative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggested that intraoperative alpha band power was significantly reduced in older adults with preoperative cognitive impairment and postoperative delirium (POD) [ 8 , 9 ]. The optimization of anesthetic exposure based on EEG monitoring was reported to ameliorate postoperative delirium (POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), while some studies have suggested that this benefit could be controversial [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. A possible reason is that these indices of anesthetic depth may not consider the influence of age on neural activity during anesthesia [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%