2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Element Substitution on Structural Transformation and Optical Performances in I2BaMIVQ4 (I = Li, Na, Cu, and Ag; MIV = Si, Ge, and Sn; Q = S and Se)

Abstract: In the exploration of new infrared nonlinear optical (IR NLO) materials, element substitution has been developed as an effective way to adjust the structural features and material performances. A series of new IR NLO materials have been discovered in the I-Ba-M-Q system ( I = Li, Na, Cu, and Ag; M = Si, Ge, and Sn; Q = S and Se), and they undergo interesting structural transformation with different element substitution except Li analogues. Herein, we have successfully synthesized three selenides with different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3.220(5) Å K-S interactions are revealed by theory calculations as weak ionic bonds (vide infra). The Ba-S interactions in [BaS 10 ] polyhedra fall into the range of 3.226(3)-3.535(7) Å, which are close to many barium-sulfides such as Ba 6 (Cu 2 Mg)Ge 4 S 16 (3.084-3.454 Å), [53] Ba 2 P 2 S 6 (3.217-3.567 Å), [31] Ba 2 AlSbS 5 (3.217-3.567 Å), [54] BaAg 2 GeS 4 (3.251-3.306 Å), [55] BaCd 2 As 2 S 6 (3.248-3.374 Å), [56] etc. The 3.24 Å ionic Ba-S interactions exhibit certain bond strengths as revealed by theory calculations (vide infra).…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Crystal Structurementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The 3.220(5) Å K-S interactions are revealed by theory calculations as weak ionic bonds (vide infra). The Ba-S interactions in [BaS 10 ] polyhedra fall into the range of 3.226(3)-3.535(7) Å, which are close to many barium-sulfides such as Ba 6 (Cu 2 Mg)Ge 4 S 16 (3.084-3.454 Å), [53] Ba 2 P 2 S 6 (3.217-3.567 Å), [31] Ba 2 AlSbS 5 (3.217-3.567 Å), [54] BaAg 2 GeS 4 (3.251-3.306 Å), [55] BaCd 2 As 2 S 6 (3.248-3.374 Å), [56] etc. The 3.24 Å ionic Ba-S interactions exhibit certain bond strengths as revealed by theory calculations (vide infra).…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Crystal Structurementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Here, we use past surveys of the I 2 –II–IV–X 4 family to predict the crystal structures of Ag 2 SrSiS 4 and Ag 2 SrGeS 4 and to further increase the accuracy of a previously developed tolerance factor approach, i.e., a pair of geometry-based descriptors designed to predict which different possible crystal structures form for particular members of the broader quaternary family. We have synthesized powders and single crystals of these two semiconductors, finding that they are isostructural and form in the noncentrosymmetric tetragonal space group I 4̅2 m , like previously studied compounds Ag 2 BaGeS 4 , Ag 2 BaSiSe 4 , and Ag 2 BaSiS 4 . During the synthesis of these two new compounds, a secondary phase is often found to co-exist with Ag 2 SrSiS 4 and Ag 2 SrGeS 4 , unless the compounds are prepared under Sr-poor conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of optical bandgaps that span the entire visible spectrum and go into the ultraviolet. For example, the optical bandgap of Ag 2 BaSiSe 4 is in the red region of the visible spectrum, with E g = 1.83 eV (Nian et al, 2018), while that of Li 2 SrSiS 4 lies in the UV at 3.94 eV (Yang et al, 2020). In order to investigate the nature of the bandgap in the title compound, electronic structure calculations were employed.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%