2021
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.051824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Empagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure by Baseline Diabetes Status

Abstract: Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but additional information is needed about whether glycemic status influences the magnitude of their benefits on heart failure and renal events. Methods: Patients with class II-IV heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were randomized to receive empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or placebo in additi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
288
0
12

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
288
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…For the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, data of diabetes subgroups were taken from post hoc studies. 18,19 Subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor use were conducted only for the HFrEF population, as data for these subgroups were only available for this population. The χ 2 test was used to test for subgroup differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, data of diabetes subgroups were taken from post hoc studies. 18,19 Subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor use were conducted only for the HFrEF population, as data for these subgroups were only available for this population. The χ 2 test was used to test for subgroup differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing studies in patients with acute heart failure that include people with and without diabetes will help answer this question further (DAPA ACT HF‐TIMI 68, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04363697; EMPULSE, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04157751). While SOLOIST‐WHF studied patients with type 2 diabetes, evidence from both DAPA‐HF and EMPEROR‐Reduced point toward an entirely consistent benefit of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in those with and without type 2 diabetes 27,31 . Therefore, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that the benefits noted in SOLOIST‐WHF would also extend to those without type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two recently completed studies—DAPA‐HF (Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Incidence of Worsening Heart Failure or Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure) and EMPEROR‐Reduced (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction)—dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, respectively, reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and HHF by 26% in patients with HFrEF 20–22 . Importantly, these benefits were observed consistently in those with and without type 2 diabetes, were in addition to excellent background heart failure therapies, and resulted in an improvement in patient reported quality of life indices 20–32 . Because both trials recruited patients with chronic ambulatory HFrEF [and excluded patients with hospitalization due to decompensated heart failure less than 4 weeks prior to enrolment (DAPA‐HF)], it can be argued that the question of in‐hospital initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors during a WHF event has remained unanswered.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it remains unclear whether the renal bene cial effect is consistent across any SGLT2is. Lastly, the EMPEROR-Reduced trial revealed that SGLT2i reduced the risk of the composite renal endpoint, independently of diabetes status [23]. We also indicated that increases in eGFR during the observation period were independent of the HbA1c levels, whereas we did not include patients without T2DM in this study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 77%