2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149995
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of energy renovation and occupants' activities on airborne particle concentrations in Swedish rental apartments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the air exchange is low there is more time for coagulation, facilitated by the high particle number concentrations generated by combustion, leading to a shift with time toward larger sizes in the particle size distribution. Even at the AER used in this study, 15 h −1 , which is relatively high compared to the average AERs of 0.5-1 h −1 in high-income countries, 29 we responsible for damages from solid biofuel combustion is a complex task, nitrogen-containing organic compounds 26 and metals 31 have been suggested to play a role in dung-burning PM toxicity. NO x , which is known to cause both cardiovascular effects 32 and serious adverse birth outcomes, [33][34][35][36][37][38] was emitted in relatively low amounts in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When the air exchange is low there is more time for coagulation, facilitated by the high particle number concentrations generated by combustion, leading to a shift with time toward larger sizes in the particle size distribution. Even at the AER used in this study, 15 h −1 , which is relatively high compared to the average AERs of 0.5-1 h −1 in high-income countries, 29 we responsible for damages from solid biofuel combustion is a complex task, nitrogen-containing organic compounds 26 and metals 31 have been suggested to play a role in dung-burning PM toxicity. NO x , which is known to cause both cardiovascular effects 32 and serious adverse birth outcomes, [33][34][35][36][37][38] was emitted in relatively low amounts in our experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Metal indoors could be emitted by indoor sources such as cooking (Fe, Al, Cu, Zn 56–58 ), candles (Cu, Sn, Co, Pb 59,60 ), incense burning (Al, Fe, Pb, Cu 61 ), and e‐cigarettes (Fe, Al, Ag, Cr, Ni, Zn 62,63 ). These activities occurred in studied homes and were identified based on occupants logbooks and confirmed by matching increase in UFP and PM2.5 concentrations 64 . However, as in this study, all samples of one type (indoor and outdoor) were pooled, it is not possible to identify specific sources of metals in these samples, as the chemistry of specific events/sources was not assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Three studies reported the peak PM 2.5 concentration during cooking. Omelekhina et al ( 2022 ) reported a single peak value as high as 3050 μg/m 3 , whereas the other two studies provided averaged peak values. Zhao’s et al demonstrated 5-min median peak PM 2.5 concentration of 37 μg/m 3 (Zhao et al 2020 ), whilst Noonan’s study reported a median peak value an order of magnitude higher at 305 μg/m 3 (Noonan et al 2012 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary I nformation 2 details the main characteristics of included studies. There were 22 studies conducted in Europe; five in the UK (Wigzell et al 2000 ; Nasir and Colbeck 2013 ; O’Leary et al 2018 ; Chakraborty et al 2020 ; Shehab et al 2021 ); three in Portugal (Alves et al 2020 ; Madureira et al 2020 ; Marques and Pitarma 2020 ); two each in Sweden (Molnar et al 2005 ; Omelekhina et al 2022 ), Italy (Frasca et al 2018 ; Pietrogrande et al 2021 ) and Greece (Sarigiannis et al 2014 ; Assimakopoulos et al 2018 ); one each in Finland (Siponen et al 2019 ), Norway (Wyss et al 2016 ), Denmark (Karottki et al 2014 ), Germany (Salthammer et al 2014 ), Poland (Jedrychowski et al 2006 ), Switzerland (Monn et al 1997 ) and Belgium (Stranger et al 2009 ); and one study was multicentric (UK and the Republic of Ireland) (Semple et al 2012 ). There was only one study each from Asia (Japan) (Ohura et al 2005 ), the Middle East (Kuwait) (Yassin et al 2012 ), Oceania (Australia) (Mazaheri et al 2018 ) and South America (Chile) (Rojas-Bracho et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%