1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf02660631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of environment on crack growth behavior in austenitic stainless steels under creep and fatigue conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation validates the explanations [14,15] that the environmental effect is negligible compared to strain aging and dislocation motion at high temperatures (i.e., in ranges from 300°C to 800°C) for 316L austenitic stainless steel, especially for the frequency of pulsed laser (1Hz in FLASH tests) that leads to environmental interactions barely able to develop. Besides, FLASH results show higher number of cycles to initiation compared with uniaxial isothermal fatigue tests under the same strain range (0.5%).…”
Section: Fatigue Analysis and Comparison With Results From Uniaxial Isupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This observation validates the explanations [14,15] that the environmental effect is negligible compared to strain aging and dislocation motion at high temperatures (i.e., in ranges from 300°C to 800°C) for 316L austenitic stainless steel, especially for the frequency of pulsed laser (1Hz in FLASH tests) that leads to environmental interactions barely able to develop. Besides, FLASH results show higher number of cycles to initiation compared with uniaxial isothermal fatigue tests under the same strain range (0.5%).…”
Section: Fatigue Analysis and Comparison With Results From Uniaxial Isupporting
confidence: 89%
“…5(b)). Unlike the generally observed FCG behavior at high temperatures, 22) the increase of FCGR with decreasing frequency at 673 K occurred at the region of higher frequencies instead at lower frequencies. Note that no frequency effect was observed at 673 K for frequencies less than 0.2 Hz in each given heat-treated condition.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The IG creep cracks, as shown in Figure 8, most likely propagate by nucleation and growth due to formation and growth of vacancy clusters at the grain boundary crack tips, as proposed by several researchers. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] These results suggest that GB creep and GB sliding occur as a fi rst step of IGSCC growth when the fresh intergranular surface is created. The measured IG creep crack growth rates are compared with IGSCC growth rates in PWR water in Figure 9.…”
Section: Role Of Grain Boundary Creep On Intergranular Stress Corrosimentioning
confidence: 98%