2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of environmental regulations on China's graphite export

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the heterogeneity test shows that this effect is relatively small for state-owned enterprises and enterprises located in central and western China. Yang et al (2017) demonstrate that the determinants of China's graphite export values include economical mass, export price, export duty refund, and language. Usman et al (2021c) empirical results show that both environmental regulations and financial constraints have positive and negative effects, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the heterogeneity test shows that this effect is relatively small for state-owned enterprises and enterprises located in central and western China. Yang et al (2017) demonstrate that the determinants of China's graphite export values include economical mass, export price, export duty refund, and language. Usman et al (2021c) empirical results show that both environmental regulations and financial constraints have positive and negative effects, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphite powder is the primary precursor for GO synthesis [ 25 ]. Graphite is found in nature in three forms, namely, as amorphous (70–80%), crystalline flakes (90–98%), and crystalline lumps or veins (90–99%) [ 26 ]. Graphite is classified into natural graphite and synthetic graphite that can be produced by graphitization utilizing heat-induced of hydrocarbon precursors [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An F test with Clustering Robust Standard Errors suggested that the FE-model was better than the OLS-model. The further analysis using the Hausman test indicated p value greater than 0.05 (Yang et al, 2017), so the RE-model was considered as the most effective model.…”
Section: Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%