2013
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of estrus synchronization on daily somatic cell count variation in goats according to lactation number and udder health status

Abstract: Two repeated experiments were carried out in 2 different years to study the effect of estrus on somatic cell count (SCC) in dairy goats. In the first year, 36 Murciano-Granadina goats were used [12 primiparous and 24 multiparous; 22 healthy and 14 with an intramammary infection (IMI)] and, after a 6-d pre-experimental period, were divided into 2 groups according to lactation number, udder health status, SCC, and milk production. One group was kept as a control, whereas the other received an estrus synchronizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work has experimentally demonstrates, for the first time to our knowledge, that stress can cause a marked elevation of SCC in lactating goats of parity ≥3. This increase is transitory with a duration of 1 to 3 days, which is similar to the effect of estrus in goats (Mehdid et al, 2013). Although the increase of SCC presented a great individual variability (from 2.5-fold to 35-fold higher than the SCC values previous to stress), the average was higher than the increase produced by estrus (6-fold increase in this work and 3.5 and 4-fold for the estrus; Mehdid et al, 2013;Moroni et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work has experimentally demonstrates, for the first time to our knowledge, that stress can cause a marked elevation of SCC in lactating goats of parity ≥3. This increase is transitory with a duration of 1 to 3 days, which is similar to the effect of estrus in goats (Mehdid et al, 2013). Although the increase of SCC presented a great individual variability (from 2.5-fold to 35-fold higher than the SCC values previous to stress), the average was higher than the increase produced by estrus (6-fold increase in this work and 3.5 and 4-fold for the estrus; Mehdid et al, 2013;Moroni et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This increase is transitory with a duration of 1 to 3 days, which is similar to the effect of estrus in goats (Mehdid et al, 2013). Although the increase of SCC presented a great individual variability (from 2.5-fold to 35-fold higher than the SCC values previous to stress), the average was higher than the increase produced by estrus (6-fold increase in this work and 3.5 and 4-fold for the estrus; Mehdid et al, 2013;Moroni et al, 2007). The fact that all the TEscc in the STR group were concentrated on day 1 suggests that they were caused by the stress suffered by the animals on day 0.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the bacteriological analysis was negative and SCC was > 1 000 000 cells/ml on two or more consecutive sampling days and for non-physiological causes, it was considered unspecific (UNS). A physiological increase in SCC, for example due to oestrus (Christodoulopoulos et al 2008) or acute stress (Mehdid et al 2013) was defined when bacteriological analysis was negative and there was an increase of SCC in both glands for a maximum of 3 consecutive sampling days which was followed by SCC < 1 000 000 cells/ml in a subsequent analysis. A gland was considered free from mastitis with negative bacterial culture and SCC < 1 000 000 cells/ml or if the increase of SCC values was due to physiological causes.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Analyzed Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sheep and goat milk is characterised by a higher fat and protein content than cow milk (Park, Juarez, Ramos, & Haenlein, 2007), an elevated natural inhibitor content (e.g., immunoglobulins, lactoferrin, or lysozyme) (Crosson, Thomas, & Rossi, 2010) and a higher somatic cell count (SCC) even in the absence of intramammary infections (Medhid, Díaz, Martí, Vidal, & Peris, 2013), potentially interfering in the microbial inhibitor test response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%