Aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are both incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) but have distinct efficacy and side effect profiles. We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of GLP-1 agonists to DPP-4 inhibitors on glycaemic control, weight and incidence of adverse events in adults with T2DM. We also sought to determine whether there was any additional effect in switching from DPP-4 inhibitor to GLP-1 agonist.
Materials and methods:We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov for (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any GLP-1 agonist to any DPP-4 inhibitor and (2) interventional studies where a DPP-4 inhibitor was switched to a GLP-1 agonist. We assessed pooled data using random-effects model (CRD42017057115).
Results:The pooled analysis of 13 RCTs (n = 4330) showed that, compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists yielded a greater mean reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of
2-7Although GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors exert their metabolic effects through the same entero-endocrine axis, they modulate diverse targets within the incretin system, resulting in distinct efficacy and side effect profiles. 8 In this context, there has been growing interest in comparing these 2 classes of anti-diabetic medications as reflected by a series of recent clinical trials [9][10][11] ; the data from these individual studies, however, might not be sufficient to provide robust estimates to guide the optimal choice between these agents. As such, ). All potentially eligible studies were considered for review, regardless of the primary outcome or language. A manual search was also performed, using references of key articles published in English.For the meta-analysis of RCTs comparing GLP-1 agonist to DPP-4 inhibitors, studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they:(1) were RCTs conducted in adults with T2DM, (2) compared any GLP-1 agonist to any DPP-4 inhibitor, (3) had at least 12 weeks duration of intervention, and (4) reported changes in HbA1c, changes in weight and the number of participants with any adverse events in each study arm. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) observational and retrospective studies, (2) studies with less than 12 weeks duration of intervention, and (3) studies that randomized patients to other therapies in addition to a GLP-1 agonist or DPP-4 inhibitor. If the result of a RCT was reported in more than one publication, we have included the data reporting the primary outcome and/or the data with duration of follow up closer to the average duration of follow up of the included studies. In addition, when studies reported more than one intervention arm using different doses of GLP-1 agonists, data from the maximum dosage was extracted as commonly used in clinical practice.For the meta-analyses of interventional switching studies, we included studies that were conducted in adults with T2DM and reported changes in HbA1c or weight before and af...