Expectancy of future reward is an important factor guiding the speed of instrumental behavior. The present study sought to explore whether signals transmitted via the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors and via dopamine D 2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) are critical for the determination of reaction times (RTs) of instrumental responses by the expectancy of future reward. A simple RT task for rats demanding conditioned lever release was used in which the upcoming reward magnitude (5 or 1 pellet) was signaled in advance by discriminative stimuli. In trained rats, RTs of conditioned responses with expectancy of a high reward magnitude were found to be significantly shorter. The shortening of RTs by stimuli predictive of high reward to be obtained was dose-dependently impaired by bilateral intra-NAc infusion of the competitive NMDA antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) (1, 2, or 10 g in 0.5 l/side), but not by infusion of the preferential dopamine D 2 antagonist haloperidol (5 and 12.5 g in 0.5 l/side) or by infusion of vehicle (0.5 l/side). In conclusion, the data reveal that in well trained animals stimulation of intra-NAc NMDA, but not of dopamine D 2 , receptors, is critically involved in guiding the speed of instrumental responses according to stimuli predictive of the upcoming reward magnitude.Key words: nucleus accumbens; goal-directed behavior; reward; dopamine; glutamate; reaction time; rat Reward expectancy is an important factor of guidance in adaptive motor behavior. Accordingly, the speed of instrumental responses has been found to be a function of the expected reward magnitude because reaction times (RTs) of rats were shortened by expectancy of signaled high reward (Brown and Bowman, 1995). Likewise, RTs of reaching movements (Hollerman et al., 1998) or saccadic eye movements (Kawagoe et al., 1998) of primates decreased as a function of the relative attractiveness of the expected reward.The nucleus accumbens (NAc) as an interface between limbic and motor structures (Groenewegen et al., 1996) may play a key role in the control of goal-directed actions by reward (Mogenson et al., 1980). It is generally assumed that the NAc subserves motivated behaviors such as feeding, sexual behavior, or exploratory locomotion elicited by primary reward and by conditioned stimuli associated with reward Everitt, 1990;Mitchell and Gratton, 1994;Watanabe, 1996). For instance, lesions of the NAc abolished conditioned place preference (Everitt et al., 1991), suggesting that environmental cues predictive for reward no longer control behavior. Furthermore, neurons in the striatum show reward expectation-related activations triggered by reward-predicting stimuli (Apicella et al., 1991;Schultz et al., 1992;Kawagoe et al., 1998). Depending on the expected type of reinforcer, behaviorrelated neuronal activity of striatal neurons is influenced differentially, implying that these neurons incorporate information about the expected behavioral outcome (Hollerman et al., 1998). Although these data suggest that ...