2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(20000515)38:10<1803::aid-pola650>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of experimental conditions on ethylene polymerization within-situ-supported metallocene catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inverse relationship between catalyst activity and Zr loading indicates that only a limited proportion of Zr sites are effectively immobilized and activated from zirconocene catalyst. This fact has been previously observed in ethylene polymerization with homogeneous and supported metallocene catalysts20, 22, 33–36 because as explained above in the UV‐Vis spectra, at higher Zr loadings, it increases the probability to get zirconocene dimmers. These inactive bimetallic species are responsible of the bimolecular deactivation of the metallocene compound 37–40.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This inverse relationship between catalyst activity and Zr loading indicates that only a limited proportion of Zr sites are effectively immobilized and activated from zirconocene catalyst. This fact has been previously observed in ethylene polymerization with homogeneous and supported metallocene catalysts20, 22, 33–36 because as explained above in the UV‐Vis spectra, at higher Zr loadings, it increases the probability to get zirconocene dimmers. These inactive bimetallic species are responsible of the bimolecular deactivation of the metallocene compound 37–40.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The supported metallocene complexes had lower activities than the corresponding homogeneous metallocene catalysts, as expected and already observed using the in situ immobilization procedure 5,6. Among the possible reasons for this poor catalytic activity of the supported systems are the significant steric hindrance around the active site caused by the support surface, the deactivation of catalytic sites and the inefficient production of active sites during the immobilization process,5 generating nearly 1% of total Zr active species after the catalyst immobilization procedure 20…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…No other preparation steps are involved and no pre‐contacting of catalyst, cocatalyst and support is required. This procedure was first described some years ago, and has been used in ethylene homopolymerization and copolymerization with the catalysts Cp 2 ZrCl 2 , Cp 2 HfCl 2 , Et(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 , Et(Ind) 2 ZrMe 2 , [(C 5 Me 4 )SiMe 2 N( t ‐Bu)]TiCl 2 (CGC catalyst from Dow) and [(CH 2 ) 5 (C 5 H 4 ) 2 ][(C 9 H 7 )ZrCl 2 ] 2 , a bridged binuclear catalyst 1–8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to do so is to support them on silica, alumina, magnesium dichloride, or other supports. [10] We have recently shown that the new metallocene catalyst in-situ immobilization technique on MAO-modified silica used to polymerize ethylene [11,12] could also be employed to obtain polypropylene with the catalyst Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 . [13,14] In the present investigation, we compare the effect of the type and concentration of alkylaluminum cocatalyst on propylene polymerization using the in-situ immobilization technique with the catalysts Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 and Me 2 Si(2-Me-Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%