function after cardiac arrest due to profound bradyarrhythmias and asystole. 2,3, 6 Precordial percussion pacing (PPP) has been reported to be one of the easy-to-perform resuscitative procedures, 7 and to induce the ventricular contractions leading to a maintenance of appropriate cardiac output in patients who have suffered from cardiac standstill or symptomatic bradycardia. 7,8 Indeed, the European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005 recommended the following: if atropine is ineffective and transcutaneous cardiac pacing is not immediately available, PPP can be attempted while waiting for pacing equipment; give serial rhythmic blows with the closed fist over the lower edge of the sternum to pace the heart at a physiological rate of 50-70 beats/min. 9 The mechanical energy used to deliver PPP and induce ventricular contraction can be as low as 0.04-1.5 J. 10 PPP C ardiac arrest remains a leading cause of unexpected sudden deaths worldwide. 1,2 The return of spontaneous circulation from the cardiac arrest largely depends on how early the event is recognized, as well as how quickly high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is provided. 1-3 Bradyarrhythmias, including complete atrioventricular block and asystole, are observed in approximately one-quater of the first recorded rhythm after cardiac arrest. 4 Transcutaneous cardiac pacing has been used as a standard method for the treatment of patients with severe bradyarrhythmias and cardiac standstill; 5 however, the transcutaneous cardiac pacing is often not readily available in many emergency situations. There is currently an unmet clinical need for simple and efficacious methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation that significantly increase likelihood of survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan. E-mail: atsushi.sugiyama@med.toho-u.ac.jp ISSN-1346-9843 All rights are reserved to the Japanese Circulation Society. For permissions, please e-mail: cj@j-circ.or.jp
Efficacy of Precordial Percussion Pacing Assessed in a Cardiac Standstill Microminipig ModelTakeshi Wada, MD, PhD; Hiroshi Ohara, MD, PhD; Yuji Nakamura, PhD; Xin Cao, MD, PhD; Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko, PhD; Kentaro Ando, PhD; Mitsuru Honda, MD, PhD; Katsunori Yoshihara, MD, PhD; Yuji Nakazato, MD, PhD; Keith G. Lurie, MD; Atsushi Sugiyama, MD, PhDBackground: Potential cardiovascular benefits of precordial percussion pacing (PPP) during cardiac standstill are unknown.