This study compared two sample approaches, pitfall traps and the Berlese-Tullgren extractor funnel, for the collection of soil-dwelling arthropod species at the University of Uyo between May and August 2023. For the study, three (3) sampling areas were selected: the Faculties of Science, Agriculture, and Engineering. The following physico-chemical parameters of the soil were measured: pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, sulphate, and nitrite. Pitfall traps made of plastic containers measuring 27cm deep with a mouth diameter of 30cm and containing 4 – 5% formalin were buried in 30cm deep dug soil. Berlese-Tullgren extractor funnels with 100watt bulbs were built from a 20L C-way plastic water container and screened with a 1mm mesh net. The results of the soil physico-chemical parameters revealed that the variables differed significantly between sampling sites at p≤0.05. Sixty-two (62) species of soil-dwelling arthropods were collected and classified into thirteen (13) orders and three classes, Insecta, Arachnida, and Diplopoda. The orders Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera comprise a large majority of the soil-dwelling arthropod species that were collected with pitfall traps. The order Diptera was unique to the Berlese-Tullgren extractor funnel, and diplopodans collected with the Berlese-Tullgren extractor sample technique were higher than those collected with the pitfall trap. A comparative analysis of the data on species diversity, individual and relative abundance, and soil-dwelling arthropod species revealed that the pitfall trap performed better than the Berlese-Tullgren extractor funnel in terms of collection efficiency. The likelihood of underrepresenting an order was eliminated since the pitfall trap sample approach, which is more efficient than the Berlese-Tullgren extractor funnel, complemented each other.