1965
DOI: 10.1104/pp.40.5.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Far-Red Light and its Interaction with Red Light in the Photoperiodic Response of Pharbitis nil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1965
1965
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…tive wheni both were giveni in that order (red followed by far-red) or simultaneously (10). These results can not be understood with the present general concept of the physiological action of the phytochrome svstem.…”
contrasting
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…tive wheni both were giveni in that order (red followed by far-red) or simultaneously (10). These results can not be understood with the present general concept of the physiological action of the phytochrome svstem.…”
contrasting
confidence: 42%
“…to red is 2 miniutes to 2 hours. In a previous paper (10) it was suggested that far-red light exerts some effect which inhibits the following dark process. It is highly probable that far-red light applied after a red interruption exerts somle effect which inhibits the flower-promoting effect of the red light, which is shown by curve b in figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Pharbitis nil, far-red light interruptions are inhibitory if given dturing the first part of a long (e.g. 48-hr) (lark period (19). The (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, far-red light has ibeen shown to inhibit flowering in a number of short-day plants including Xanthiiuni pensylvanictum (1,10), Glycine mttax (3,18), Chenopodiumii rubrumi-(5, 6), Lemiina perpusilla (17), Chrysanthentiuni sp. (4), Kalanchoe blossfeldiana (8,11), and most extensively Pharbitis nil ( 15, 16,19,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%