2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feed restriction programs and slaughter age on digestive efficiency, growth performance and body composition of growing rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
45
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
45
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Gidenne et al (2009a), the decrease in feed intake level from 100 to 90, 80, 70 and 60% of ad libitum linearly enhanced feed conversion at the expense of daily growth and final LW. Only the mildest feed restriction (90% of ad libitum) improved feed conversion (3% compared to the control group) without worsening growth performance (Gidenne et al, 2009a), as confirmed in other trials (Birolo et al, 2016; present study).…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Restrictionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Gidenne et al (2009a), the decrease in feed intake level from 100 to 90, 80, 70 and 60% of ad libitum linearly enhanced feed conversion at the expense of daily growth and final LW. Only the mildest feed restriction (90% of ad libitum) improved feed conversion (3% compared to the control group) without worsening growth performance (Gidenne et al, 2009a), as confirmed in other trials (Birolo et al, 2016; present study).…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Restrictionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Under our condition, however, feed restriction did not affect nutrient digestibility coefficients (Table 3), as also found by Birolo et al (2016) in rabbits submitted to mild feed restriction rates (93% of ad libitum intake). In fact, in the present study, the digestibility trial took place during the 3 rd wk when R and L rabbits showed similar feed intake.…”
Section: Effect Of Feed Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…En parallèle, l'indice de consommation technique (ICt) est amélioré de 10 à 15 % (figure 8b), mais avec une assez grande variabilité qui peut dépendre de la composition chimique de l'aliment. Des résultats similaires ont été enregistrés pour des systèmes cunicoles italiens (Birolo et al, 2016). L'application d'une restriction de 25 % entraîne une réduction de 34 % des débits fécaux (53 à 35 g MS/j), du fait d'une meilleure efficacité digestive (Gidenne et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Stratégie D'alimentation Et Indice De Consommationunclassified