2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-016-1069-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of feeding restriction on growth and dressing percentages in Mexican hairless pig

Abstract: Twenty-four male Mexican hairless pigs, weighing 16 ± 1.12 kg, were used to evaluate growth performance and carcass yield in pigs fed 2 (L), 3 (M) and 4 (H) times the Metabolizable Energy (ME) required for maintenance. The pigs were assigned randomly to two experimental rearing systems (indoors and outdoors). They were fed daily according to their respective feeding regimen (FR). The indoor pigs were fed ad libitum with chopped star grass forage (Cynodon nlemfuensis). The outdoor pigs had access during 16 h to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between Lithuanian pig breeds in the proportions of carcass primal cuts were lower than those between autochthonous Italian Casertana and Large White, and commercial Duroc pigs [39]. Low feeding regimen for Mexican hairless pigs together with their age increase at slaughter increased the yield of all primal cuts [52]. Feeding restriction at the finishing phase also tended to increase (p = 0.061) the proportion of belly.…”
Section: Growth Rate Of Pigs and Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The differences between Lithuanian pig breeds in the proportions of carcass primal cuts were lower than those between autochthonous Italian Casertana and Large White, and commercial Duroc pigs [39]. Low feeding regimen for Mexican hairless pigs together with their age increase at slaughter increased the yield of all primal cuts [52]. Feeding restriction at the finishing phase also tended to increase (p = 0.061) the proportion of belly.…”
Section: Growth Rate Of Pigs and Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Future studies should be conducted to evaluate a more subtle restrictive energy feeding to achieve the desired goals. Previous research (Aharoni et al, 1995;Luccia et al, 2003;Rodríguez-González et al, 2016) has demonstrated that feeding higher energy rations increased DM, protein, and lipids compared to feeding a lower energy ration. The concentration of intramuscular fat has been shown to be important for meat palatability and flavor (Fisher et al, 2000;Hopkins et al, 2006).…”
Section: Carcass Traits and Meat Nutritional Compositionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…En un trabajo posterior realizado por Rodríguez-González et al (2016) se evaluó la posibilidad de incrementar a 70 kg el peso vivo al sacrifico de los CCP, pero sin incrementar la grasa en la canal, para lo cual, se propuso restringir el consumo de alimento, pero con acceso a forraje fresco para reducir el estrés por hambre. Se evaluaron tres niveles de alimentación: Bajo, 2 veces el requerimiento de energía para mantenimiento; Medio, 3 veces y Alto, 4 veces.…”
Section: Evaluación Del Comportamiento Productivo Del Cerdo Pelónunclassified
“…Se encontró que la restricción de alimento redujo la ganancia diaria de peso (0.300, 0.438 y 0.501 kg, respectivamente), sin embargo, se mejoró significativamente el rendimiento de carne (25.0, 22.8 y 22.0 kg de cortes primarios, respectivamente) y se redujo drásticamente el rendimiento total de grasa en la canal (18.9, 22.8 y 24.5 kg de grasa total, respectivamente). Tal y como lo reportaron Santos-Ricalde y Lean ( 2006), en el trabajo de Rodríguez-González et al (2016) también se incrementó el consumo de forraje, conforme aumento el nivel de restricción de alimento (0.092, 0.121 y 0.307 kg de MS/día para el nivel Alto, Medio y Bajo, respectivamente).…”
Section: Evaluación Del Comportamiento Productivo Del Cerdo Pelónunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation