2007
DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30994-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fiber Level and Physical Form of Starter on Growth and Development of Dairy Calves Fed No Forage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
125
10
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
125
10
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that when forage consumption is at 15% of solid feed intake (Mirzaei et al, 2015), gut fill will increase and may artificially improve BW and improve feed efficiency, which is supported by lack of treatment effect in skeletal growth measures reported in the present study. It should also be noted that texturized starter diets have greater intake than meal starters, possibly because of more rumination and greater ruminal pH (Porter et al, 2007;Khan et al, 2011). Despite the changes that were observed in starter intake and BW gain with the addition of AH in the present study, no significant differences were observed among AH treatments and CON regarding feed efficiency (P > 0.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that when forage consumption is at 15% of solid feed intake (Mirzaei et al, 2015), gut fill will increase and may artificially improve BW and improve feed efficiency, which is supported by lack of treatment effect in skeletal growth measures reported in the present study. It should also be noted that texturized starter diets have greater intake than meal starters, possibly because of more rumination and greater ruminal pH (Porter et al, 2007;Khan et al, 2011). Despite the changes that were observed in starter intake and BW gain with the addition of AH in the present study, no significant differences were observed among AH treatments and CON regarding feed efficiency (P > 0.11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, NDF digestibility decreased over time, which may have been associated with pH. By increasing the starter intake and consequently dropping pH, out flow rate would potentially be increased and retention time decreased (Hoover, 1986;Porter et al, 2007;Laarman and Oba, 2011). The findings of the present study are supported by those of Castells et al (2012) who noted that total tract apparent DM, OM and NDF digestibilities did not differ between treatments that contain forage, but CP digestibility of free choice forage treatments were greater or similar to, but never lower than, calves fed starter without forages.…”
Section: Skeletal Growth Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All have reported that ADG was improved when calves were fed textured starter but not a fine ground starter. Porter et al (2007) also showed that greater ADG in neonatal calves fed coarse meal diet in comparison to a fine ground diet that had been pelleted. Our results are in accordance with those of Coverdale et al (2004), who found an increase in ADG when calves were fed textured starter in comparison to a finely ground starter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Cereal rolling would ensure larger particle size than grinding (Beauchemin et al, 2001;Dehghan-banadaky et al, 2007), and therefore is an interesting, better than grinding or pelleting, alternative for preventing ruminal acidosis (Gimeno et al, 2015). Porter et al (2007) reported greater average daily gain (ADG), starter intake, and earlier rumination time in neonatal calves fed coarse meal diet vs pelleted fine particle diet. However, a minimal particle size is required because consumption of diets with too many fine particles can lead to a rumen parakeratosis (Greenwood et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation