2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Filling Ratio on Thermal Performance of Closed Loop Pulsating Heat Pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When heat is dissipated from one loop, the working fluid flows back to the heater to absorb heat and then dissipate heat in the next loop, which is shown to enhance heat transport compared with the single-loop pulsating heat pipe. 35 Heating temperatures ranging from 100°C to 125°C were tested to evaluate the heat pipe's thermal performance in waste heat recovery systems because the temperature of waste gas set in many industrial systems is generally over 100°C to prevent pipeline corrosion induced by water condensation. 36 FR ranging from 50% to 70% were reported to result in the best thermal performance of a pulsating heat pipe, [37][38][39] and hence FR of 50%, 60%, and 70% were evaluated in this study, which had a small effect on the flow pattern, although FR affects the flow characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When heat is dissipated from one loop, the working fluid flows back to the heater to absorb heat and then dissipate heat in the next loop, which is shown to enhance heat transport compared with the single-loop pulsating heat pipe. 35 Heating temperatures ranging from 100°C to 125°C were tested to evaluate the heat pipe's thermal performance in waste heat recovery systems because the temperature of waste gas set in many industrial systems is generally over 100°C to prevent pipeline corrosion induced by water condensation. 36 FR ranging from 50% to 70% were reported to result in the best thermal performance of a pulsating heat pipe, [37][38][39] and hence FR of 50%, 60%, and 70% were evaluated in this study, which had a small effect on the flow pattern, although FR affects the flow characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1f shows the inner structure of the proposed heat pipe, where three loops were inner‐connected. When heat is dissipated from one loop, the working fluid flows back to the heater to absorb heat and then dissipate heat in the next loop, which is shown to enhance heat transport compared with the single‐loop pulsating heat pipe 35 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid is transferred owing to the pressure difference between the evaporator and condenser. However, the liquid return in RHP depends on the centrifugal force 236‐290 . There are two types of RHPs; axial RHP and radial RHP.…”
Section: Thermal Management Of Pem Fuel Cells and Gaps In Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ling et al [34] experimentally studied the impact of filling ratio on a closed-loop HP system with separated micro-channel evaporator and condenser as a cooling device, showing that the optimal filling ratio was in the range 88-101%. Babu et al [35] studied the thermal performance of a pulsating heat pipe, by CFD simulation and experiments, showing that the filling ratio of 60% led to a smaller thermal resistance. Molan et al [36] experimentally investigated the effect of the filling ratio on the thermal performance of a multi-turn pulsating heat pipe, indicating that the optimal filling ratio may be in the range 48.8-66.1%.…”
Section: Filling Ratio Of the Working Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%