2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fluid slippage on eddy growth and non-Darcian flow in rock fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inertial effects can lead to permeability reduction, which is directly related to development and growth of RZs inside the pores and fractures [16,21]. We resorted to the open source of MATLAB code to be able to capture and quantify the growth of RZs In terms of slippery boundary condition (BC), we followed previous study [21] by specifying a slip length (L s ) along the fracture walls.…”
Section: Automatic Recirculation Zone Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Inertial effects can lead to permeability reduction, which is directly related to development and growth of RZs inside the pores and fractures [16,21]. We resorted to the open source of MATLAB code to be able to capture and quantify the growth of RZs In terms of slippery boundary condition (BC), we followed previous study [21] by specifying a slip length (L s ) along the fracture walls.…”
Section: Automatic Recirculation Zone Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inertial effects can lead to permeability reduction, which is directly related to development and growth of RZs inside the pores and fractures [16,21]. We resorted to the open source of MATLAB code to be able to capture and quantify the growth of RZs In terms of slippery boundary condition (BC), we followed previous study [21] by specifying a slip length (L s ) along the fracture walls. Different from previous study, we considered six cases with different L s : (1) Case 1: No slip case with L s equal to 0 m; (2) Case 2: L s was homogeneous and set to be the minimum value in the case 3; (3) Case 3: L s varies along the fracture length that depends on the fracture aperture field following the equation proposed by [21]; (4) Case 4: L s was homogeneous and set to be the arithmetic mean value in the case 3; (5) Case 5: L s was homogeneous and set to be the median value in the case 3; and, (6) Case 6: L s was homogeneous and set to be the maximum value in the case 3.…”
Section: Automatic Recirculation Zone Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations