1997
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Focus Lateralization on Memory Assessment during the Intracarotid Amobarbital Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impaired memory performance is observed in about 20–30% of cases after injection into the epileptic hemisphere, whereas this proportion reaches 60–80% after contralateral injection (Powell et al., 1987; Rausch et al., 1989; Wyllie et al., 1991). Based on these data, several authors advocate IAT performance as a way to predict task‐specific memory decline after surgery (and eventually to propose surgical abstention if global amnesia is predicted), and as an adjunct to determine seizure focus laterality (Wyllie et al., 1991; Perrine et al., 1993; Rouleau et al., 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impaired memory performance is observed in about 20–30% of cases after injection into the epileptic hemisphere, whereas this proportion reaches 60–80% after contralateral injection (Powell et al., 1987; Rausch et al., 1989; Wyllie et al., 1991). Based on these data, several authors advocate IAT performance as a way to predict task‐specific memory decline after surgery (and eventually to propose surgical abstention if global amnesia is predicted), and as an adjunct to determine seizure focus laterality (Wyllie et al., 1991; Perrine et al., 1993; Rouleau et al., 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impaired memory performance is observed in about 20-30% of cases after injection on the side of the epileptic hemisphere, whereas this proportion reaches 60-80% after contralateral injection [65,69,95]. Based on these data, several authors advocate IAT performance as a way to predict task-specific memory decline after surgery (and possibly to propose surgical abstention if global amnesia is predicted), and as an adjunct to determine seizure focus laterality [61,74,95]. However, considering the above mentioned drawbacks of the IAT plus the uncertain proper delivery of the sodium amobarbital to the hippocampal formation [57], several studies have assessed the potential clinical added-value of functional neuroimaging in this clinical indication (for reviews or commentaries, see, e.g., [57,58,68]).…”
Section: Preoperative Mapping Of Episodic Memory Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milner et al expanded the use of the Wada test to measure unilateral memory function in epilepsy surgery candidates in order to predict postoperative amnesia 12 . Since then, the contributions of the Wada test have been widely extended and include: (i) lateralisation of seizure focus [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] ; (ii) prediction of seizure control outcome 29,[33][34][35] ; and (iii) prediction of neuropsychological outcome [36][37][38][39][40][41] . On the other hand, its value to preclude postoperative amnesic syndromes still remains open to question 42,43 .…”
Section: The Wada Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laterality of Wada memory performance is based on the assumption that memory function mediated by medial temporal structures reflects the damage caused by or underlying epileptogenesis: intact performance on the non-epileptogenic side and impaired performance on the epileptogenic hemisphere 13 . Using absolute or comparative lateralising criteria of Wada memory performance from both hemispheres, 50-80% of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy are correctly lateralised [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . In the remainder, Wada memory performance is symmetrical and therefore the laterality is indeterminate.…”
Section: False/reverse Lateralisationmentioning
confidence: 99%