2008
DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2008.42.3.816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of foliar nitrogen and sulphur application on aromatic expression of <em>Vitis vinifera</em> L. cv. Sauvignon blanc

Abstract: <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Aims</strong>: It is well known that vine nitrogen deficiency can negatively impact on aroma in white wines. Soil nitrogen fertilization enhances aroma expression, but it also increases vine vigour and susceptibility to grey rot. The aim of this work was to investigate the impact of foliar nitrogen as well as foliar nitrogen and sulphur applications on aromatic expression, vigour and susceptibility to grey rot of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc.&l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter study showed that foliar application of 2 kg N/ha of urea in a Tempranillo vineyard led to an increase in pH and a reduction of alcoholic strength and total acidity in wine that were even more significant when the dose of urea was greater (4 kg N/ha). Despite this fact, our results are in agreement with those reported by Lacroux et al (2008) who found no differences in these parameters between control and foliar treated samples, although it must be considered that these authors did not mention the dose of nitrogen applied. A positive outcome of our study is the fact that urea application (Ur1) led to an improvement of wine phenolics-related parameters without modifying other important factors such as pH, total acidity or alcoholic strength.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The latter study showed that foliar application of 2 kg N/ha of urea in a Tempranillo vineyard led to an increase in pH and a reduction of alcoholic strength and total acidity in wine that were even more significant when the dose of urea was greater (4 kg N/ha). Despite this fact, our results are in agreement with those reported by Lacroux et al (2008) who found no differences in these parameters between control and foliar treated samples, although it must be considered that these authors did not mention the dose of nitrogen applied. A positive outcome of our study is the fact that urea application (Ur1) led to an improvement of wine phenolics-related parameters without modifying other important factors such as pH, total acidity or alcoholic strength.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nitrogen compounds in the grape juice are of great interest in wine-making as they are crucial nutrients for yeast. Indeed, grape juices with high yet balanced amino acid contents result in a greater synthesis of ethyl esters, which are considered to be desirable for wine quality due to their fruity aromas (Lacroux et al 2008). Figures 1, 2, and 3 show the amino acid profiles in grape juice for the different N treatments during this two-year study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To improve the urea effects on grape and wine quality, some studies have been carried out on the addition of sulphur to urea foliar applications. In this way, urea plus sulphur treatment applied to Sauvignon Blanc grapevines provided improved yeast assimilable nitrogen, which increased volatile thiols and glutathione in the wines obtained . In Petit Manseng, this treatment increased the contents of several amino acids in the grapes during the first season of a study .…”
Section: Biostimulants To Improve Grape and Wine Qualitymentioning
confidence: 94%