2003
DOI: 10.1080/00063650309461302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of food abundance on laying date and clutch size in the White StorkCiconia ciconia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between nest occupation date and productivity can be spatially complex and vary between years (Gordo et al 2013). Mean clutch size recorded in our study was equal or higher than previously reported in Europe (Tortosa et al 2003;Profus et al 2004;Kosicki 2010), suggesting highly favorable feeding conditions in our study area (Tortosa et al 2003). Brood reduction was positively related to the number of hatchlings with most chicks dying 1-2 weeks after hatching (N.B., unpublished data; Kosicki 2012).…”
Section: Breeding and Growth Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The link between nest occupation date and productivity can be spatially complex and vary between years (Gordo et al 2013). Mean clutch size recorded in our study was equal or higher than previously reported in Europe (Tortosa et al 2003;Profus et al 2004;Kosicki 2010), suggesting highly favorable feeding conditions in our study area (Tortosa et al 2003). Brood reduction was positively related to the number of hatchlings with most chicks dying 1-2 weeks after hatching (N.B., unpublished data; Kosicki 2012).…”
Section: Breeding and Growth Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, it is difficult to imagine how this can affect reproduction in Spanish white storks since the period between arrival and laying dates notably exceeds that recorded for eastern European populations (about 15 days; Tryjanowski et al 2004). Furthermore, the guaranteed food supplies from rubbish dumps throughout the breeding season would diminish the importance of an early return (Tortosa et al 2002(Tortosa et al , 2003Massemin-Challet et al 2006). These strong differences force us to stress more caution when results for the better studied eastern European populations are extrapolated to the Iberian populations, because both groups are probably under different ecological pressures as a result of the environmental peculiarities of their breeding, wintering and passage areas (Bernis 1959).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The hydrological network density and the distance from the nest to the nearest cultivated arable field reflect foraging conditions on the breeding grounds. The amount of available food is known as a very important environmental parameter affecting breeding success in White Storks (Tryjanowski and Kuźniak 2002;Tortosa, Pérez, and Hillström 2003;Denac 2006). The fact that the nest-site is of equal importance with foraging conditions emphasizes the significance of this parameter for breeding success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%