1990
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1990.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of food coadministration on 5-aminosalicylic acid oral suspension bioavailability

Abstract: Single doses of 1 gm 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) suspension was administered to 24 healthy volunteers during both fasting and fed conditions. For subjects in a fasting state, plasma 5-ASA and acetyl 5-ASA concentrations peaked rapidly 1 hour after dosing to 14.72 micrograms/ml and 11.4 micrograms/ml, respectively. The elimination half-life of 5-ASA was 51.9 minutes, whereas the acetyl 5-ASA half-life could not be determined. A mean of 78.3% of the dose was excreted in the urine, with 5-ASA accounting for 21.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Absorption of 5-ASA took place rapidly (t max Յ 0.5 h), showing the t max is shorter than the reported values of 1 h. 22 Plasma concentration of N-acetyl-5-ASA was higher than that of 5-ASA and elimination was nearly complete in 7 h (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Plasma Concentration Profiles After Oral Administration Of 5mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Absorption of 5-ASA took place rapidly (t max Յ 0.5 h), showing the t max is shorter than the reported values of 1 h. 22 Plasma concentration of N-acetyl-5-ASA was higher than that of 5-ASA and elimination was nearly complete in 7 h (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Plasma Concentration Profiles After Oral Administration Of 5mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Without sulfapyridine, the adverse reaction profile following 5-ASA treatment is supposed to be more acceptable. We previously described the pharmacokinetics of 5-ASA suspension [8]. This study demonstrated the need to develop a modified release oral formulation to provide adequate drug to the small and large intestines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mixing of drug and feed may, however, result in interactions affecting the bioavailability of the drug and thereby the possibilities of achieving therapeutically active concentrations at the site of the infection (Palmer et al 1983;Kniffen et al 1989). Furthermore, it can be assumed that the influence of feed present in the gastrointestinal tract on the absorption of orally administered drugs will not be the same for different drugs (Yu et al 1990;Baggot 1992;Sutter et al 1993). Previous studies with sulphadiazine and trimethoprim (Nielsen & Gyrd-Hansen 1994a) have shown that the bioavailability of these two compounds after oral administration to fasted pigs was 89% and 90%, respectively, versus 85% and 92% in the group of fed pigs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%