2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of food matrix on amandin, almond (Prunus dulcis L.) major protein, immunorecognition and recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection methods may either target the allergen, which is ideal, or indirectly target a marker for the allergen presence, which is more common. Method selection is often dictated by the availability of antibodies and primers, the identified target allergen, the food-processing history, the food matrix (van Hengel 2007, Kirsch et al 2009, Monaci & Visconti 2009, Tiwari et al 2010, Cucu et al 2013, Mandalari et al 2014, and the degree of allergen characterization, particularly human allergy epitopes (Poms et al 2004, Monaci & Visconti 2009). Chemical interactions between nontargeted proteins and the detection antibody pose additional problems when allergenic proteins from food matrices are analyzed (Cucu et al 2013, Montserrat et al 2015.…”
Section: Food Allergen Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detection methods may either target the allergen, which is ideal, or indirectly target a marker for the allergen presence, which is more common. Method selection is often dictated by the availability of antibodies and primers, the identified target allergen, the food-processing history, the food matrix (van Hengel 2007, Kirsch et al 2009, Monaci & Visconti 2009, Tiwari et al 2010, Cucu et al 2013, Mandalari et al 2014, and the degree of allergen characterization, particularly human allergy epitopes (Poms et al 2004, Monaci & Visconti 2009). Chemical interactions between nontargeted proteins and the detection antibody pose additional problems when allergenic proteins from food matrices are analyzed (Cucu et al 2013, Montserrat et al 2015.…”
Section: Food Allergen Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point is illustrated by a comparative study of six commercially available kits for peanut allergen detection that reported a wide variation in sample recovery and sensitivities ( Jayasena et al 2015). Food matrix, analyte source (van Hengel 2007, Tiwari et al 2010, Cucu et al 2013, and food processing (Montserrat et al 2015) are also known to affect ELISA performance. It is therefore useful to determine immunoassay sensitivity, specificity, and robustness for optimal assay performance.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemicals for fatty acids analyses; palmitic acid (16:0), palmitoleic acid (16:1), stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1 n9), linoleic acid (18:2, n6), linolenic acid (18:3, n3) standards and trace amounts of other fatty acid standards existing in almonds, saturated and USFA methyl esters, methanol, acetonitrile, ethyl alcohol, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, hexane, isopropanol, NaCl, KHCO 3 and deionized water.…”
Section: Chemicals Organic Solvents Equipment and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The almond is one of the essential species in this gene source. Also, it has considerable economic value with its different usage areas [1][2][3]. Part of the Rosaceae family, the almond [Prunus dulcis (Mill.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation