SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1981
DOI: 10.2118/10323-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Formation Compaction on Steam Injection Response

Abstract: Formation compaction, if present, can have an important influence on thermal recovery methods, as observed in Western Venezuela, and elsewhere. This paper discusses the effect of formation compaction on oil production by cyclic steam stimulation and steamflooding, using a fully implicit steam injection simulator. The simulator accounts for three-phase mass and heat transport occurring in steam injection processes, for a wide variety of operating conditions. It employs an implicit formulation together \l7ith a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field development of large compacting fields such as Groningen, Wilmington, the Bolivar coast of Venezuela, or Ekofisk led to the development of techniques for estimating compaction, starting with the work of Geertsma [13][14][15] and followed by a number of modified reservoir models. [16][17][18][19] The common feature of such reservoir-compaction models was that the compaction is treated as a 1D problem (uniaxial strain) by assuming that (a) only vertical deformations take place and (b) each vertical column of blocks deforms independently. Consequently, the porosity changes were calculated by modifying the conventional compressibility cR based on the results of uniaxial strain laboratory experiments, and the stress problem was not solved.…”
Section: Modeling Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field development of large compacting fields such as Groningen, Wilmington, the Bolivar coast of Venezuela, or Ekofisk led to the development of techniques for estimating compaction, starting with the work of Geertsma [13][14][15] and followed by a number of modified reservoir models. [16][17][18][19] The common feature of such reservoir-compaction models was that the compaction is treated as a 1D problem (uniaxial strain) by assuming that (a) only vertical deformations take place and (b) each vertical column of blocks deforms independently. Consequently, the porosity changes were calculated by modifying the conventional compressibility cR based on the results of uniaxial strain laboratory experiments, and the stress problem was not solved.…”
Section: Modeling Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. 1 can then be written %t[q,EPpxipSpAxAYAz(t)]+flux terms = source terms, ... (2) where Az(t) is written as a function of time because gridblock thickness may change as the reservoir compacts. Porosity is related to Az and the rock density through the constancy of mass of rock in the gridblock as follows: Letting subscript zero denote the known initial condition and assuming that Ax and Ay remain constant (compaction occurs only in the z direction), we obtain Rock density is known to be a function of pressure and temperature through the equation of state for the rock.…”
Section: Compaction In Reservoir Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%