1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(96)04644-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of formulation variables on drug and polymer release from HPMC-based matrix tablets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar reports were found in literature by Sung et al (1996) that reported no differences on the adinazolam mesilate release between formulations produced with Methocel ® K15M and Methocel ® K100M. They concluded that there were limitations in the polymer viscosity when small amounts are used.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar reports were found in literature by Sung et al (1996) that reported no differences on the adinazolam mesilate release between formulations produced with Methocel ® K15M and Methocel ® K100M. They concluded that there were limitations in the polymer viscosity when small amounts are used.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Dürig, Venkatesh, and Fassihi (1999) related that magnesium stearate is a critical erosion-controlling excipient, particularly if it is used over 1.0%. In an investigation of controlled release tablets using HPMC, they observed that high levels of magnesium stearate (> 2.5%), influenced the balance between radial and axial Sung et al (1996), they are released preferentially by erosion while soluble drugs can dissolve and diffuse through the hydrated gel layer (Reza, Quadir, Haider, 2003;Ibrhim, Daes, Bangudu, 2000). The dissolution assay results demonstrated that the amount of polymer used was very important to control the drug release.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of the CS-M containing formulation, a gel transformation occurred which exhibited no disintegration and erosion, maintaining its shape for the duration of the study. This retention of shape ensured steady release of drug and hence prevented dose dumping (20). Overall, CS-M based formulations exhibited an ideal release profile when compared to the commercial brands, thus demonstrating comparable performance to these polymers.…”
Section: In Vitro Drug Release Studiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Criteria for selection of drug candidate for GRD [26] The gastricretentive drug delivery systems are suitable for following types of drug therapy.…”
Section: Posturementioning
confidence: 99%