1980
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90250-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fractionated doses of pions on normal tissues: Part II. Mouse jejunum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

1980
1980
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A RBE value of 1.32 is estimated by Jordan et al (1981) for inducing kidney injury and Raju et al (1980) have reported a RBE of about 1.3 based on acute skin reaction where 300 kV X-rays served as reference radiation in both cases. However under similar experimental conditions as we used, Peters et al (1980) have obtained a RBE value of 1.42 which is higher than that observed in this study. This may be, at least in part, due to a different reference radiation used or due to the variations in the pion beam configuration at LAMPF and SIN or due to the different strains of mice used.…”
Section: Rbe-values For Multiple Fraction Treatmentcontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A RBE value of 1.32 is estimated by Jordan et al (1981) for inducing kidney injury and Raju et al (1980) have reported a RBE of about 1.3 based on acute skin reaction where 300 kV X-rays served as reference radiation in both cases. However under similar experimental conditions as we used, Peters et al (1980) have obtained a RBE value of 1.42 which is higher than that observed in this study. This may be, at least in part, due to a different reference radiation used or due to the variations in the pion beam configuration at LAMPF and SIN or due to the different strains of mice used.…”
Section: Rbe-values For Multiple Fraction Treatmentcontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…For two fractions delivered at a 3-h interval, the proportion of dose recovered was 0.38 and 0.31 for X-rays and pions respectively. The amount of dose repaired was more for X-rays than for pions but the difference between the two values was not so pronounced as reported by Peters et al (1980) for two The difference between the proportion of dose recovered for two fractions of pions and gamma rays observed by the above-stated authors is about 4 times more than our estimate. With reference to them, the fractional recovery of pion induced gut damage in our experiments is about 1.7 times higher.…”
Section: The Fraction Of "Dose Repaired"contrasting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations