2016
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fragmentation on the Costa Rican dry forest avifauna

Abstract: Deforestation and changes in land use have reduced the tropical dry forest to isolated forest patches in northwestern Costa Rica. We examined the effect of patch area and length of the dry season on nestedness of the entire avian community, forest fragment assemblages, and species occupancy across fragments for the entire native avifauna, and for a subset of forest dependent species. Species richness was independent of both fragment area and distance between fragments. Similarity in bird community composition … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since urban vegetation patches are often patchy and isolated, the spatial context of the patches can influence on the biodiversity within them (Watling and Donnelly 2006 ). The survival and abundance of mammals might depend on numerous habitat variables, including habitat quality, connectivity, and distance between habitat patches (Lindenmayer and Possingham 1995 ; Umapathy and Kumar 2000 ; Chetkiewicz et al 2006 ; Barrantes et al 2016 ). Unfortunately, spatial context of the patches such as proximity, isolation, and isolation were not analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since urban vegetation patches are often patchy and isolated, the spatial context of the patches can influence on the biodiversity within them (Watling and Donnelly 2006 ). The survival and abundance of mammals might depend on numerous habitat variables, including habitat quality, connectivity, and distance between habitat patches (Lindenmayer and Possingham 1995 ; Umapathy and Kumar 2000 ; Chetkiewicz et al 2006 ; Barrantes et al 2016 ). Unfortunately, spatial context of the patches such as proximity, isolation, and isolation were not analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species richness and abundance typically decline as a result of habitat fragmentation, at least until populations adjust to the size of the habitat (de Castro and Fernandez 2004 ; Lee et al 2014 ). Moreover, micro- and macro-climatic changes increase in plant mortality, regeneration of vegetation, increase of predation risk, and invasion by other species often occur in response to habitat fragmentation (Umapathy and Kumar 2000 ; Barrantes et al 2016 ). In urban woods, these changes would be expected to influence mammal species and their habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits our understanding of important biological processes such as dispersal movement, reproductive success, and effects of isolation, particularly for specialist species. However, the extensive knowledge of forest fragments provides some insights to the approach that should be taken to avoid or at least reduce the depletion of species from the already threatened urban successional habitats (Barrantes, Ocampo, Ramírez-Fernández, & Fuchs, 2016). A priority in this direction will be to protect natural and semi-natural early successional vegetation, and enhance their connectivity.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest fragmentation may lead to fluctuations in population size, operational sex ratios, reproductive success, effective population size, and population viability (Zimmerman and Bierregaard 1986, Caro 1998, Laurance et al 1998, 2011, Fahrig 2003, Fischer and Lindenmayer 2007). Investigators in previous studies have compared the species richness and abundance of forest fragments of different sizes and with different degrees of isolation (Bolger et al 1991, Sisk et al 1997, Peter et al 2015, Stratford and Stouffer 2015, Wolfe et al 2015, Aurélio‐Silva et al 2016, Barrantes et al 2016). However, changes in life‐history traits following habitat alteration suggest behavioral flexibility in fragmented landscapes mediated by individual movement, thus maintaining population viability for some species (Peacock and Smith 1997, Bayne and Hobson 2001, Newman et al 2013) and indicating the need to address mechanisms of behavioral regulation in altered landscapes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%