2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00099-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of gait cycle selection on EMG analysis during walking in adults and children with gait pathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foot contact event detection is usually limited to initial contact and toe-off (De Stefano et al, 2004;Desailly et al, 2009). However, this kind of gait timing does not allow for distinguishing between type I and II.…”
Section: Foot-floor Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Foot contact event detection is usually limited to initial contact and toe-off (De Stefano et al, 2004;Desailly et al, 2009). However, this kind of gait timing does not allow for distinguishing between type I and II.…”
Section: Foot-floor Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the analysis is carried out selecting "clean hits" obtained from the force plate or by using pressure footswitches. The work by De Stefano et al (2004) proposed (automatic and semi-automatic) methods as an alternative to the more traditional manual segmentation, and analyzed how the gait cycle selection affects the EMG analysis. They found that, in CP children, the segmentation method used for gait cycle selection has a major influence in the study of the EMG signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When using conventional prostheses, people with transtibial amputation typically require 10-30% more metabolic energy to walk at the same speeds as non-amputees and this metabolic discrepancy becomes more pronounced at faster walking speeds. A greater metabolic demand implies that amputees fatigue sooner and more often, and are not able to sustain the same walking speeds as non amputees [1] [2]. Therefore it is not surprising that amputees preferred walking speeds are typically 30-40% slower than non amputees [3], [11]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Action potentials are given off by each of the motor units activated during a given contraction. The timing and intensity of the EMG during a phase or the entire gait cycle can tell us a lot about neurological control and muscle weakness [1].Temporal and spatial parameters such as stride length, cadence [2], [3], and the timing of stance and swing periods are commonly recorded along with EMG to describe, classify or identify normal and pathological gait. Surface Electromyogram (SEMG), which represents activation states of muscles, has been widely used in muscle strength measurement, rehabilitation, torque relation and human-robot interaction because of non-invasiveness and easiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%