2019
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2018.2881138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Gamma-Ray Energy on Image Quality in Passive Gamma Emission Tomography of Spent Nuclear Fuel

Abstract: Gamma-ray images of VVER-440 and SVEA-96 spent nuclear fuel assemblies were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection algorithm from measurements with a passive gamma emission tomography prototype instrument at Finnish nuclear power plants. Image quality evaluation criteria based on line profiles through the reconstructed image are used to evaluate image quality for spent fuel assemblies with different cooling times, and thus different mixtures of gamma-ray emitting isotopes. Image characteristics at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholds are typically selected to enhance the contribution of a single gamma-ray emitting isotope ( 137 Cs, 154 Eu) in each window. More detailed descriptions of the PGET instrument can be found in [4,6,10].…”
Section: Measurement With the Pget Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thresholds are typically selected to enhance the contribution of a single gamma-ray emitting isotope ( 137 Cs, 154 Eu) in each window. More detailed descriptions of the PGET instrument can be found in [4,6,10].…”
Section: Measurement With the Pget Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PGET instrument is able to reliably identify single missing or replaced pins in WWER-440, BWR and PWR SFAs with burnups in the range of 5.7-57.8 GWd/tU and cooling times from 1.9-26.6 years [3][4][5]. Images reconstructed using gamma ray energies higher than those of 137 Cs (>700 keV) have better water-to-fuel contrast in fuel cooled for up to 20 years and thus have the most potential for missing fuel pin detection [6]. Following these first results, IAEA has expressed the need for new image reconstruction and processing methods for a more accurate assessment of the locations and count of missing pins and a more accurate calculation of the relative radioactivity levels of individual pins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 2 mm stagger is devoted to obtaining 182 data collections, referred to as counts, per each view. The technical details of the PGET detector system are reported in [3,2,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any safeguards investigation of SFAs, it is important to use a minimum amount of a priori information on the SFA under study, in order to avoid biasing and potentially misleading the investigation. Eventually, IAEA approved the use of the passive gamma emission tomography (PGET) instrument [2][3][4][5][6][7] in inspections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%