2018
DOI: 10.31031/rdms.2018.03.000567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Gap between Airfoil and Embedded Rotating Cylinder on the Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The embedment was set up along the camber line of the aerofoil while maintaining a gap of 0.005 m between the cylinder and the aerofoil. The gap was set to optimum configuration performance for the model's embedment (Abdulla & Hasan, 2018). The embedment of the cylinder at 3/20 of the camber line was utilized to optimize its diameter to fit the aerofoil's leading edge and trailing edge, and thus satisfied with the experimental data by Michael S. Selig and James Gugliemo (Selig & Guglielmo, 1997).…”
Section: Geometry and Computational Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The embedment was set up along the camber line of the aerofoil while maintaining a gap of 0.005 m between the cylinder and the aerofoil. The gap was set to optimum configuration performance for the model's embedment (Abdulla & Hasan, 2018). The embedment of the cylinder at 3/20 of the camber line was utilized to optimize its diameter to fit the aerofoil's leading edge and trailing edge, and thus satisfied with the experimental data by Michael S. Selig and James Gugliemo (Selig & Guglielmo, 1997).…”
Section: Geometry and Computational Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh Independency Test. In order to monitor the solution grid independence before commencing with the model testing phase, a mesh independency test (MIT) was recommended (Abdulla & Hasan, 2018). It was obtained by establishing a new cell grid and testing it utilizing various alternatives.…”
Section: Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the gap between the rotating cylinder and the airfoil is a key parameter affecting aerodynamic performance. Abdulla et al [29] determined, through numerical simulations at rotation ratios of 1, 2, and 3, that maintaining a gap of 3 mm resulted in the maximum lift-to-drag ratio. Najdat [30] analyzed the effects of different rotation speed ratios, angles of attack, and gaps on the aerodynamic performance of trailing-edge rotating cylinders through numerical and experimental methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%