2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612011000400027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of genotype, finishing system, and sex on physiochemical characteristics of goat meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
6
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
5
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to another study conducted by [31], it was recorded with an average of 24.34 ± 0.43 and 24.01 ± 0.95% of 90 and 180 days kids meat, respectively which appeared to be relatively similar to that of observed in group B goat meat in the present study. The findings of [30] Rodrigues et al, (2011) supported the present study, they reported the WHC of goat meat in between 22 to 30 %. Variable results of WHC could be attributed with age of goat as it has significant effect on the WHC of the meat [34].…”
Section: Pearson Correlation Between Glycogen and Physical Characterisupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to another study conducted by [31], it was recorded with an average of 24.34 ± 0.43 and 24.01 ± 0.95% of 90 and 180 days kids meat, respectively which appeared to be relatively similar to that of observed in group B goat meat in the present study. The findings of [30] Rodrigues et al, (2011) supported the present study, they reported the WHC of goat meat in between 22 to 30 %. Variable results of WHC could be attributed with age of goat as it has significant effect on the WHC of the meat [34].…”
Section: Pearson Correlation Between Glycogen and Physical Characterisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, the cooking loss in present study was found to be in similar range of [4]. However, present results more or less are in a similar range of that of analyzed by [30] for cooking loss in goat meat (33.34 to 35.85%). Whilst, [32] also supported the results of presents study who observed the cooking loss as 38.72 ± 0.60% of goat meat slaughtered at age of < 7 m, 35.77 ± 0.86 %, of 8-10 m and 33.40 ± 1.13% of > 11 m of age.…”
Section: Pearson Correlation Between Glycogen and Physical Characterisupporting
confidence: 84%
“…An increase in the pH and EC, 72 h after slaughter, suggests a possible meat quality decline at the temperature set for the presented study. The scheme of pH value-changes recorded for the presented study in goat meat acidity is in accordance with other authors (Argüello et al, 2005;Marichal et al, 2003;Pieniak-Lendzion et al, 2009;Rodrigues et al, 2011;Stanišić et al, 2012). The pH value of goat organs measured in the successive time gaps, varied due to the different internal structure of the various organs.…”
Section: The Ph and Ecsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Werdi Pratiwi et al (2007) also observed that different goat muscles had a varied TD value. We have also found a strong negative relationship between the WHC and TD previously noted by Rodrigues et al (2011).…”
Section: Water Holding Capacity and Thermal Dripsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, several authors have shown the fact that high‐energy diets protect animals against potentially glycogen‐depleting stressors. This protection results in lower pH (Immonen, Ruusunen, Hassia, & Puolanne, ; Priolo, Micol, Agabriel, Prache, & Dransfield, ). The pH values in our study are considered high since they exceed the ultimate pH (5.8) reported by Normand et al ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%