2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of gradient microstructures on strengthening and toughening of AZ31

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Fig. 11, it is apparent that when the Young's modulus is low so the maximum microhardness is also low, as in Mg alloys, Cu alloys and Al alloys [25,33,46,47,52,[57][58][59][60][61]. With an increase in the Young's modulus, the maximum microhardness increases and the superalloy has the highest Young's modulus and the maximum microhardness [48,66].…”
Section: Nature Of the Maximum Microhardness Of The Gradient Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Fig. 11, it is apparent that when the Young's modulus is low so the maximum microhardness is also low, as in Mg alloys, Cu alloys and Al alloys [25,33,46,47,52,[57][58][59][60][61]. With an increase in the Young's modulus, the maximum microhardness increases and the superalloy has the highest Young's modulus and the maximum microhardness [48,66].…”
Section: Nature Of the Maximum Microhardness Of The Gradient Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…and SP [47,57,58], a 7075 aluminum alloy processed by SP and ultrasonic shot peening (USP) [59][60][61], a pure copper processed by SMAT, surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT) and 3S [25,46,52], an H62 copper alloy processed by 3S [33], a pure titanium processed by surface rolling treatment (STR) [51], a TC4 titanium alloy processed by laser peening (LP) and SP [62,63], a 304 stainless steel processed by 3S…”
Section: Nature Of the Maximum Microhardness Of The Gradient Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] Originating from the heterodeformationinduced (HDI) effect between regions with different grain sizes results in extra strengthening of the material. [21,22] The experimental techniques to obtain GNG samples include surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT), [23] severe shot peening (SSP), [24] surface mechanical grinding treatment (SMGT), [25,26] electrodeposition, [27] and induction heating, [28] et al However, the grains of the samples obtained by these methods are mostly randomly distributed. It is challenging to obtain an ordered structure with regular grain distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ease of joining E and FS processes offers the possibility of experimenting with them, especially as concerns the parts controlling the flow of the worked material, i.e., the plunger face. The gradient structure is created in various metallic materials to increase their strength [ 9 , 10 , 11 ] or obtain better electrical properties [ 12 ]. In most cases, obtaining this microstructure in a wire requires a multi-stage process based on plastic deformation by twisting [ 12 ] or compression bonding [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%