2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5006852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grain boundary phase on the magnetization reversal process of nanocrystalline magnet using large-scale micromagnetic simulation

Abstract: We investigated the effects of grain boundary phases on magnetization reversal in permanent magnets by performing large-scale micromagnetic simulations based on Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation under a periodic boundary. We considered planar grain boundary phases parallel and perpendicular to an easy axis of the permanent magnet and assumed the saturation magnetization and exchange stiffness constant of the grain boundary phase to be 10% and 1%, respectively, for Nd2Fe14B grains. The grain boundary phase paral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where A(x) is the exchange stiffness constant, M s is the saturation magnetization, K 1u is the uniaxial anisotropy constant, andê a is the easy axis [42][43][44][45] . The simulation model is segmented into 268,435,456 cubic cells of dimensions 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 nm 3 to simulate the magnetization dynamics using the finite-difference method under periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where A(x) is the exchange stiffness constant, M s is the saturation magnetization, K 1u is the uniaxial anisotropy constant, andê a is the easy axis [42][43][44][45] . The simulation model is segmented into 268,435,456 cubic cells of dimensions 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 nm 3 to simulate the magnetization dynamics using the finite-difference method under periodic boundary conditions.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective magnetic field on ith cell, H eff i , is defined as the derivative of the micromagnetic energy, E cont i (obtained from Eq. ( 2)), with respect to M i [47]:…”
Section: Effect Of Anisotropic Exchange On Coercivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current scenario, it has consistently reduced with an increase in the content of the soft phase as shown in figure 10(e). As a result of the high dipole field and the lack of a potential barrier, the domain wall moves perpendicular to the easy axis, causing the nucleation field to diminish [73]. The Bohr magnetron (μ B ) was calculated and plotted in figure 10(f).…”
Section: Vibrating Sample Magnetometrymentioning
confidence: 99%