2016
DOI: 10.3390/su8010056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Grazing Exclusion on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Organic Carbon of Leymus chinensis Grassland in Northern China

Abstract: Abstract:Overgrazing has caused vegetation destruction and soil degradation in Leymus chinensis grassland, the widely distributed type of grassland in northern China. To restore the degraded ecosystem, grazing exclusion was implemented in 1979, 1999, and 2004. However, changes in the vegetation and soil organic carbon (SOC) in different years of grazing exclusion have not been thoroughly elucidated. This paper examines the changes in vegetation characteristics (i.e., biomass, cover, richness, degree of success… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta‐analysis by other researchers revealed that grazing exclusion increased the amount of carbon by 112% as litter fall, belowground biomass by 26%, and soil carbon by 14% compared with other grazing practices (Xiong et al, ). Similarly, a study in the Xilin River basin of northern China with Leymus chinensis L. and Carex tristachya showed that as the exclusion duration increased from 0 to 11 years, SOC stocks increased by 14.3% (or 0.26 g kg −1 of soil; Chen & Tang, ). However, a further increase of grazing exclusion duration from 11 to 31 years did not increase SOC stocks.…”
Section: Grazing Exclusion and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta‐analysis by other researchers revealed that grazing exclusion increased the amount of carbon by 112% as litter fall, belowground biomass by 26%, and soil carbon by 14% compared with other grazing practices (Xiong et al, ). Similarly, a study in the Xilin River basin of northern China with Leymus chinensis L. and Carex tristachya showed that as the exclusion duration increased from 0 to 11 years, SOC stocks increased by 14.3% (or 0.26 g kg −1 of soil; Chen & Tang, ). However, a further increase of grazing exclusion duration from 11 to 31 years did not increase SOC stocks.…”
Section: Grazing Exclusion and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To curb further degradation and rejuvenate degraded grasslands, China implemented a series of policies. ‘Grazing exclusion’ was established in 1979 (Chen & Tang, ) with the goal of total elimination of grazing. A follow‐up programme ‘Grain‐for‐Green’ was established in the late 1990s to encourage food production without affecting grassland ecosystems.…”
Section: Background Of Northern China Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the compiled studies, the duration of grazing exclusion varied from 1 year to 11 years. Compared to short-term grazing exclusion, grazing exclusion with longer years often leads to higher plant productivity and coverage because the exclusion of livestock grazing creates a suitable environment for plant growth [58]. In this case, the inputs of soil organic matter (e.g., litter and dead roots) may increase with the duration of grazing exclusion and contribute to continuous accumulations in both SOC and STN stocks.…”
Section: Factors Controlling the Effects Of Grazing Exclusion On Soc mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many scholars suggest that the grassland conservation programs have had positive impacts on restoring grassland vegetation [23][24][25][26], others argue that these programs have generated negative impacts on the larger scale ecosystem. Critics of the programs point out that grazing pressures were shifted to non-program areas, thus increasing grassland degradation in non-program areas, and that illegal grazing activities were common [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%