2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00178-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and forced convection I: Evaluation of convective mass transfer coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed by Jain and Tiwari (2004). The total energy for moisture removal from the crop, at any given temperature and pressure, is the sum of the latent heat of vaporisation and the binding energy of the moisture in the crop.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were observed by Jain and Tiwari (2004). The total energy for moisture removal from the crop, at any given temperature and pressure, is the sum of the latent heat of vaporisation and the binding energy of the moisture in the crop.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The vapour pressure in the crop increases with increase of crop temperature. On the other hand, the vapour pressure in the air reduces as the relative humidity (RH) of the air reduces, and this can be achieved by increasing the air temperature (Rogers and Mayhew, 1993;Jain and Tiwari, 2004). Thus crop drying becomes very effective when both the crop and the surrounding air are constantly warm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concluded that the drying operation allow the exploitation of polyethylene greenhouses in summer time when not used [9].Jain and Tiwari studied of convective mass transfer coefficient and performed moisture removal rate from cabbage and peas for open sun and inside greenhouse drying. It concluded in natural mode, the convective mass transfer coefficient was lower inside the greenhouse drying as compared to open sun drying and in the initial stage of drying, its value was doubled below forced mode inside greenhouse drying than natural convection [10].Tiwari et al made an attempt to check out the convective mass transfer coefficient by regression analysis during jaggery drying in the roof type even span greenhouse under natural and forced convection mode. It was found that the complete drying of jaggery under forced convection as quicker than under natural convection as expectable and convective mass transfer coefficient in forced convection was greater than in natural convection mode [11].Jain and Tiwari presented mathematical model to investigate the effect of greenhouse on crops drying (Cabbage and Peas) under natural and forced convection and for open sun drying (natural convection) [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat and mass transfer coefficients are important parameters in the simulation of drying rates, since the temperature difference between the air and food product varies with these coefficients. Jain D [28] evaluated the convective heat-transfer coefficient for some of the crops (green peas, green chillies, white gram, onion, onions and potatoes) under solar drying condition and developed a mathematical model to predict the drying parameters [29]. Further studies the dependence of convective heat-transfer coefficient on the drying time during complete solar drying process of green peas and cauliflower.…”
Section: Effect Of Drying Characteristic On Quality Of Garlicmentioning
confidence: 99%