2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grid sensitivity on the performance of wall adapting SGS models for LES of swirling and separating–reattaching flows

Abstract: The present study assesses the performance of the Wall Adapting SGS models along with the Dynamic Smagorinsky model for flows involving separation, reattachment and swirl. Due to the simple geometry and wide application in a variety of engineering systems, the Backward-Facing Step (BFS) geometry and Confined Swirling Flow (CSF) geometry are invoked in the present case.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the tracer gas and the target gas were dispersed in the same way. Zhou et al 28 validated the effectiveness of the method by regarding supply air and indoor air as two fluids with the same physical properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the tracer gas and the target gas were dispersed in the same way. Zhou et al 28 validated the effectiveness of the method by regarding supply air and indoor air as two fluids with the same physical properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closure model was utilized in conjunction with URANS turbulence model. The wall-adapting local eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for LES was used since the previous studies have shown good results for a confined reacting flow [ 44 , 45 ]. In both cases, the wall functions were used for turbulent viscosity and thermal diffusivity .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant C w = 0.325 and V c is the volume of the grid cell. While the WALE model can be overdissipative in strong vortical flows (Bricteux, Duponcheel & Winckelmans 2009), it has been found to perform better than the dynamic Smagorinsky model for simulating flow separation (Arya & De 2019) and flow over rough beds (Lian et al 2019). For this study, the main turbulent generation mechanism is eddies shed from the roughness elements and no strong shear layers formed; therefore, the WALE model is appropriate.…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%