2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/536171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Ground Motion Directionality on Fragility Characteristics of a Highway Bridge

Abstract: It is difficult to incorporate multidimensional effect of the ground motion in the design and response analysis of structures. The motion trajectory in the corresponding multi-dimensional space results in time variant principal axes of the motion and defies any meaningful definition of directionality of the motion. However, it is desirable to consider the directionality of the ground motion in assessing the seismic damageability of bridges which are one of the most vulnerable components of highway transportati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current approach to earthquake response analysis involves arbitrarily inputting two horizontal ground motions to structures without considering the direction of the input. However, studies have indicated that this method may underestimate seismic fragility, particularly in bridges [42,43]. It has been shown that the horizontal component of earthquake excitation significantly affects the torsional response of stress-ribbon bridges.…”
Section: Comparison Of Responses From Different Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current approach to earthquake response analysis involves arbitrarily inputting two horizontal ground motions to structures without considering the direction of the input. However, studies have indicated that this method may underestimate seismic fragility, particularly in bridges [42,43]. It has been shown that the horizontal component of earthquake excitation significantly affects the torsional response of stress-ribbon bridges.…”
Section: Comparison Of Responses From Different Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve realistic results, it is essential to take soil structure interaction into account while modeling the structural system for bridges. In the literature, many of the researchers used soil springs to reflect this interaction [2,5,15,16] During the modeling process in the OpenSees program, "Py Simple1" material model was used for lateral soil resistance and "Tz Simple1" material model was used for axial resistance. The pile elements were divided into 0.5 m long members for the first 10 m length below the pile cap and 1 m long members for the last 10 m. The springs were assigned to the nodes of these small elements.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the effect of the loading direction on the dynamic characteristics of geometrically straight bridge structures. Torbol et al (2012) and Basu and Shinozuka (2011) highlighted the importance of considering the effect of the incidence angle in the seismic fragility assessment of bridge structures and concluded that neglecting this parameter may lead to an underestimation of the resultant fragility functions. Similarly, Taskari et al (2015) evaluated the multi-angle fragility of straight bridges and concluded that the fragility of individual components is highly sensitive to the input loading orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%