2005
DOI: 10.37855/jah.2005.v07i02.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of growth retardants on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of high density peach trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since GA stimulates the elongation of cells and thus is intimately involved in vegetative growth of plants. These results are in agreement with the findings of Kumar et al [7] who reported that cultar @ 1500 ppm was most effective in reducing the plant height, extension growth and shoot internode length in peach trees under high density planting system. Similar results have been confirmed by Basak [8] in Jonagold apple trees and Miller [9] in Red Chief Delicious apple trees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since GA stimulates the elongation of cells and thus is intimately involved in vegetative growth of plants. These results are in agreement with the findings of Kumar et al [7] who reported that cultar @ 1500 ppm was most effective in reducing the plant height, extension growth and shoot internode length in peach trees under high density planting system. Similar results have been confirmed by Basak [8] in Jonagold apple trees and Miller [9] in Red Chief Delicious apple trees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because, a threshold concentration is required for growth inhibition (Birecka, 1967) [2] , with reports of low concentrations actually promoting stem elongation (Tolbert, 1961;Halevy and Wittwer, 1965) [21,6] . Furthermore, fruit number and yield increased by application of cycocel @ 1500 ppm on peach but had no significant effect on fruit weight, TSS and acidity (Kumar et al 2005) [9] . According to Kulkarni et al (2018) [8] three different concentrations (1000, 1500, 2000 mg/l) of CCC at three different stages (5, 7, 12 leaf stage) were superior in respect to reducing total shoot length, internodal distance, leaf area, cane weight and increased cane thickness, petiole diameter and well developed cluster primordial (Percent fruitfulness).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%