Effect of habitual dietary-protein intake on appetite and satiety

Long, SJ; Jeffcoat, A; Millward, D. J.

doi:10.1006/appe.2000.0332

Cited by 62 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, we may share with rats a more primitive capacity to acquire anticipatory hunger and satiety, according to the experience of hunger returning or not returning after eating from a certain menu and/or at a particular time of day or in a specific social or physical context. One of the present authors has learnt to augment rice-based meals with high protein foods, in the expectation that the protein will delay the rise in hunger (Booth et al, 1970;French et al, 1992;Long et al, 2000) that otherwise occurs once the rice has been quite rapidly digested and absorbed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Acquisition of texture-cued fasting-anticipatory meal-size change in rats with adequate energy intake

et al. 2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Acquisition of texture-cued fasting-anticipatory meal-size change in rats with adequate energy intake

et al. 2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, no studies have been undertaken in athletes, and methodological differences and inconsistent macronutrient manipulations in studies in non-athletes make it difficult to draw clear conclusions. In addition, the habitual protein intake of the participants is not commonly reported, which is important as protein gastric emptying and satiety response has been demonstrated to have a reduced effect on individuals with high habitual protein intakes (Long, Jeffcoat, & Millward, 2000;Shi et al, 1997). There is evidence to suggest that many athletes already consume protein above the current recommendations (Rodriguez, Di Marco, & Langley, 2009); in the range of~1.5-2.5 g·kg day −1 (Bradley et al, 2015;Cole et al, 2005;Lundy, O'Connor, Pelly, & Caterson, 2006;Schokman, Rutishauser, & Wallace, 1999), and therefore may have a differing satiety response to supplemental protein than non-athletes or individuals with lower protein intakes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

The effect of a whey protein supplement dose on satiety and food intake in resistance training athletes

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Food pleasantness was rated after initial tasting. All ratings were made on general labeled magnitude scales (5,8).…”

Section: Appetite Ratingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering that caffeine can stimulate both lypolysis and energy expenditure (7), the ingestion of caffeinated drinks must be controlled in such studies. The differences in terms of macronutrients also compromise the interpretation of the results (8).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of protein quality on appetite and energy metabolism in normal weight subjects

Alfenas

Bressan

Paiva

2010

Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of consumption of different protein sources on food intake and energy expenditure in normal weight subjects. Subjects and methods: Breakfast preparations (casein, soy protein, whey protein or control) were ingested during seven consecutive days. Appetite, food intake, and energy expenditure were assessed. Results: Casein consumption led to a lower energy intake than whey protein. There was lower energy intake on day 7 than on day 1 of the casein session. Soy protein preparations resulted in higher diet induced thermogenesis (DIT) than in control preparations. The respiratory quotient (RQ) obtained in the whey protein session was lower than the control and soy protein sessions. Conclusion: These results suggest that the consumption of different protein types leads to distinct effects on satiety (casein), DIT (soy protein), and/or RQ (whey protein). Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54(1):45-51 Keywords Appetite; food intake; energy expenditure; soy protein; whey protein; casein RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os efeitos do consumo de diferentes fontes proteicas na ingestão alimentar e gasto energético em indivíduos eutróficos. Sujeitos e métodos: Preparações (caseína, proteína da soja, proteína do soro de leite ou controle) foram ingeridas no desjejum, durante sete dias consecutivos. Resultados: A caseína resultou em menor ingestão calórica do que o soro de leite. Houve uma menor ingestão calórica no último dia da sessão da caseína em relação ao primeiro dia. Preparações contendo proteína da soja resultaram em maior termogênese induzida pela dieta (TID) em comparação às preparações controle. O cociente respiratório (CR) obtido na sessão do soro de leite foi menor que na sessão controle e da proteína da soja. Conclusão: Esses resultados sugerem que o consumo de diferentes tipos de proteínas resulta em efeitos distintos na saciedade (caseína), TID (proteína da soja) e/ou CR (proteína do soro). Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2010;54(1):45-51 Descritores Apetite; ingestão alimentar; gasto energético; proteína da soja; caseína

show abstract

Effect of habitual dietary-protein intake on appetite and satiety

Cited by 62 publications

References 20 publications

Acquisition of texture-cued fasting-anticipatory meal-size change in rats with adequate energy intake

Acquisition of texture-cued fasting-anticipatory meal-size change in rats with adequate energy intake

The effect of a whey protein supplement dose on satiety and food intake in resistance training athletes

Effects of protein quality on appetite and energy metabolism in normal weight subjects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About