2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hammer and pin milling on triboelectrostatic separation of legume flour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative study on pin mill and hammer mill before air classification has shown that hammer milling produced flour fractions of larger particle sizes (257 μm) and resulted in lower fractionation efficiency due to poor disentanglement of protein particles from starch granules (Vitelli et al., 2020). Therefore, hammer mills at lower rotational speeds are best suited to dehull seeds (Saldanha do Carmo et al., 2022) or produce small‐sized grits for further size reduction using ultrafine mills.…”
Section: Dry Fractionation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparative study on pin mill and hammer mill before air classification has shown that hammer milling produced flour fractions of larger particle sizes (257 μm) and resulted in lower fractionation efficiency due to poor disentanglement of protein particles from starch granules (Vitelli et al., 2020). Therefore, hammer mills at lower rotational speeds are best suited to dehull seeds (Saldanha do Carmo et al., 2022) or produce small‐sized grits for further size reduction using ultrafine mills.…”
Section: Dry Fractionation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study by Vitelli et al. (2020), the impact of milling approaches on electrostatic separation of navy bean flour was examined using hammer and pin milling systems. Pin milling resulted in a mean diameter of 70.2 μm and hammer milling produced a larger mean diameter of 112.7 μm.…”
Section: Dry Fractionation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein recovery could be increased by >30% by decreasing the average particle size of the feed. The impact of hammer milling versus pin milling on the efficiency of a triboelectrostatic separation showed that the D 90 of particles had a diameter <167.9 and 257.0 μm for pin‐milled and hammer‐milled flour, respectively (Vitelli et al, 2020). Moreover, hammer milling yielded larger average particle size and lower triboelectric separation efficiency.…”
Section: Micromeritic Properties Of Legume Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulses are known to have higher kernel hardness than cereals and require special types of mills for converting them into flours. Impact milling types such as hammer and pin mills are suitable technologies for milling pulses [ 45 ]. Protein concentrate production makes use of pin mill ( Figure 3 ) followed by air classification ( Figure 4 ) of the flour into fine/lighter components (proteins) and coarser/denser components (starch) [ 46 ].…”
Section: Processing Technologies For Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%