2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of handrail shape on graspability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). While some research has concluded that a person can grasp a Type I and Type II handrail equally well (Dusenberry et al, 2009), methodological concerns with that research; such as using seated participants, unnatural grasping tasks, and inadequate statistical analyses; indicate further research is needed.…”
Section: Size and Shapementioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). While some research has concluded that a person can grasp a Type I and Type II handrail equally well (Dusenberry et al, 2009), methodological concerns with that research; such as using seated participants, unnatural grasping tasks, and inadequate statistical analyses; indicate further research is needed.…”
Section: Size and Shapementioning
confidence: 98%
“…"Barrier-free" and "age-friendly" are closely related terms [8]. However, the idea of barrier-free is no longer fit for fast-changing environments, whereby the concept of universal design is gradually replacing it.…”
Section: Barrier-free Handrail Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have provided recommended ranges for each of the shape parameters independently but did not take into account the interactions of multiple‐shape parameters, thus the optimum handle shape has not been determined. Other studies have evaluated the grasping comfort of hand tools using multiple instruments of varying shapes (Dianat, Nedaei, & Mostashar Nezami, ; Dusenberry, Simpson, & DelloRusso, ; Herring, Castillejos, & Hallbeck, ; Kuijt‐Evers, Bosch, Huysmans, de Looze, & Vink, ). These researchers described the relative order of the grasping comfort of multiple samples but did not determine the optimal shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%